Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM)
TSM leads on 13 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Applied Materials, Inc. and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
$567.25Technology
TSM
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
$423.93Technology
Total return — AMAT vs TSM
growth of $100 · last 29yAMAT +4523.1%TSM +7621.9%TSM compounded faster
AMAT TSM
AMAT vs TSM: by the numbers
- •TSM is the larger company ($2.20T vs $450.37B market cap).
- •TSM trades at the lower earnings multiple (35.24 vs 53.31 P/E).
- •TSM converts more revenue to profit (46.90% vs 29.31% net margin).
- •TSM grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.49% vs 9.33% CAGR).
- •TSM pays the higher dividend yield (0.83% vs 0.34%).
Which is better, AMAT or TSM?
Metric tally: AMAT 3 · TSM 13It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTSM(lower P/E)
GrowthTSM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTSM(higher dividend yield)
QualityTSM(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | AMAT | TSM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 53.31 | 35.24● |
| Forward P/E | 46.38 | — |
| P/S ratio | 15.62● | 16.45 |
| P/B ratio | 18.96 | 11.92● |
| PEG ratio | 76.90 | 0.64● |
| EV / EBITDA | 41.89 | 20.78● |
| FCF yield | 1.32% | 1.62%● |
Profitability
| Metric | AMAT | TSM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 61.78%● |
| Operating margin | 29.51% | 53.15%● |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 46.90%● |
| ROE | 35.58%● | 33.98% |
| ROIC | 21.96% | 25.10%● |
Dividends
| Metric | AMAT | TSM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.34% | 0.83%● |
| Payout ratio | 21.93% | 33.09% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AMAT | TSM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.33% | 22.49%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 17.13% | 25.67%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 9.02% | 30.09%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 34.01%● | 30.87% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AMAT or TSM?
- It depends on your goal. value: TSM (lower P/E); growth: TSM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TSM (higher dividend yield); quality: TSM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TSM leads 13 to 3.
- Is AMAT or TSM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TSM is cheaper: AMAT trades at a 53.31 P/E and TSM at 35.24.
- Which has grown faster, AMAT or TSM?
- Over the past five years, TSM grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 9.33% CAGR versus TSM at 22.49%.
- Does AMAT or TSM pay a bigger dividend?
- AMAT yields 0.34% and TSM yields 0.83% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AMAT or TSM more profitable?
- TSM runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 29.31% versus TSM at 46.90%.
- Which has been the better investment, AMAT or TSM?
- Over the past 10-year, AMAT delivered the higher annualized total return — AMAT at 38.64% versus TSM at 35.19%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Applied Materials P/E ratioTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing P/E ratioApplied Materials dividend yieldTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing dividend yieldApplied Materials ROETaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing ROEApplied Materials operating marginTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing operating marginApplied Materials revenue growthTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing revenue growthApplied Materials free cash flowTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing free cash flow
Applied Materials & Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.