Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs Target Corporation (TGT)
A side-by-side comparison of Applied Materials, Inc. and Target Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: AMAT is classified in Technology; TGT is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
$476.46TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
TGT
Target Corporation
$144.18Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — AMAT vs TGT
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yAMAT +24231.5%TGT +3345.1%AMAT compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
AMAT TGT
AMAT vs TGT: by the numbers
- •AMAT is the larger company ($378.29B vs $65.49B market cap).
- •TGT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (18.54 vs 48.58 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •AMAT converts more revenue to profit (29.31% vs 3.24% net margin).
- •AMAT grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.33% vs -0.29% CAGR).
- •TGT pays the higher dividend yield (3.25% vs 0.37%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AMAT | TGT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 48.58 | 18.54 |
| Forward P/E | 42.09 | 19.22 |
| P/S ratio | 14.23 | 0.60 |
| P/B ratio | 17.27 | 3.90 |
| PEG ratio | 76.84 | N/A |
| EV / EBITDA | 45.66 | 9.98 |
| FCF yield | 1.44% | 4.89% |
Profitability
| Metric | AMAT | TGT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 28.14% |
| Operating margin | 29.51% | 4.49% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 3.24% |
| ROE | 35.58% | 21.04% |
| ROIC | 21.96% | 9.76% |
Dividends
| Metric | AMAT | TGT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.37% | 3.25% |
| Payout ratio | 21.93% | 55.88% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AMAT | TGT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.33% | -0.29% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 17.13% | -1.34% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 9.02% | -17.01% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 31.94% | -8.75% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, AMAT or TGT?
- TGT has the lower trailing P/E: AMAT trades at 48.58 and TGT at 18.54. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, AMAT or TGT?
- Over the past five years, AMAT grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 9.33% CAGR versus TGT at -0.29%.
- Does AMAT or TGT pay a bigger dividend?
- AMAT yields 0.37% and TGT yields 3.25% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AMAT or TGT more profitable?
- AMAT runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 29.31% versus TGT at 3.24%.
- How have AMAT and TGT total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, AMAT delivered 35.87% and TGT delivered 9.69% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Applied Materials P/E ratioTarget P/E ratioApplied Materials dividend yieldTarget dividend yieldApplied Materials ROETarget ROEApplied Materials operating marginTarget operating marginApplied Materials revenue growthTarget revenue growthApplied Materials free cash flowTarget free cash flow
Applied Materials & Target appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.