Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs Snap Inc. (SNAP)
A side-by-side comparison of Applied Materials, Inc. and Snap Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: AMAT is classified in Technology; SNAP is classified in Communication Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
$476.46TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
SNAP
Snap Inc.
$4.77Communication ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT
Total return — AMAT vs SNAP
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 9yAMAT +1473.1%SNAP -81.5%AMAT compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
AMAT SNAP
AMAT vs SNAP: by the numbers
- •AMAT is the larger company ($378.29B vs $8.06B market cap).
- •AMAT is profitable (29.31% net margin) while SNAP runs a net loss (-6.72%).
- •SNAP grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.73% vs 9.33% CAGR).
- •AMAT pays a dividend (0.37% yield), while SNAP has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AMAT | SNAP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 48.58 | N/A |
| Forward P/E | 42.09 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 14.23 | 1.25 |
| P/B ratio | 17.27 | 3.66 |
| PEG ratio | 76.84 | N/A |
| EV / EBITDA | 45.66 | N/A |
| FCF yield | 1.44% | 7.98% |
Profitability
| Metric | AMAT | SNAP |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 55.77% |
| Operating margin | 29.51% | -6.77% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | -6.72% |
| ROE | 35.58% | -19.66% |
| ROIC | 21.96% | -8.20% |
Dividends
| Metric | AMAT | SNAP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.37% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 21.93% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AMAT | SNAP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.33% | 16.73% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 17.13% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 9.02% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 31.94% | -42.83% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, AMAT or SNAP?
- Over the past five years, SNAP grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 9.33% CAGR versus SNAP at 16.73%.
- Does AMAT or SNAP pay a bigger dividend?
- AMAT pays a dividend (0.37% yield), while SNAP has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is AMAT or SNAP more profitable?
- AMAT runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 29.31% versus SNAP at -6.72%.
- How have AMAT and SNAP total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, AMAT delivered 35.87% and SNAP delivered -42.83% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Applied Materials P/E ratioSnap P/E ratioApplied Materials dividend yieldSnap dividend yieldApplied Materials ROESnap ROEApplied Materials operating marginSnap operating marginApplied Materials revenue growthSnap revenue growthApplied Materials free cash flowSnap free cash flow
Applied Materials & Snap appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.