Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ)

Over the past 10 years, AMAT outperformed QQQ — 38.64% vs 21.67% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

A side-by-side comparison of Applied Materials, Inc. and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — AMAT vs QQQ

growth of $100 · last 27y
AMAT +3619.7%QQQ +1312.7%AMAT compounded faster
01k2k3k4kStart $10020042009201420192024$3,720$1,413
AMAT QQQ

Did AMAT beat QQQ?

Over the past 10 years, AMAT outperformed QQQ — 38.64% vs 21.67% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

Total return (annualized)

MetricAMATQQQ
Total return (1Y)226.83%35.85%
Total return CAGR (3Y)60.72%26.74%
Total return CAGR (5Y)34.01%16.84%
Total return CAGR (10Y)38.64%21.67%

QQQ is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).

Frequently asked

Has AMAT beaten QQQ?
Over the past 10 years, AMAT outperformed QQQ — 38.64% vs 21.67% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.