Is AMAT or PLTR cheaper?

On trailing earnings, AMAT is cheaper: AMAT trades at a 53.31 P/E and PLTR at 142.21.

Which has grown faster, AMAT or PLTR?

Over the past five years, PLTR grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 9.33% CAGR versus PLTR at 34.11%.

Does AMAT or PLTR pay a bigger dividend?

AMAT pays a dividend (0.34% yield) while PLTR does not currently pay one.

Is AMAT or PLTR more profitable?

PLTR runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 29.31% versus PLTR at 43.67%.

Which has been the better investment, AMAT or PLTR?

Over the past 5-year, PLTR delivered the higher annualized total return — AMAT at 38.64% versus PLTR at 38.98%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR)

AMAT leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Applied Materials, Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

AMAT

Applied Materials, Inc.

$450.37B

$567.25Technology

PLTR

Palantir Technologies Inc.

$293.87B

$127.99Technology

Total return — AMAT vs PLTR

growth of $100 · last 6y

AMAT +851.0%PLTR +1247.3%PLTR compounded faster

AMAT PLTR

AMAT vs PLTR: by the numbers

•AMAT is the larger company ($450.37B vs $293.87B market cap).
•AMAT trades at the lower earnings multiple (53.31 vs 142.21 P/E).
•PLTR converts more revenue to profit (43.67% vs 29.31% net margin).
•PLTR grew revenue faster over the past five years (34.11% vs 9.33% CAGR).
•AMAT pays a dividend (0.34% yield) while PLTR does not currently pay one.

Which is better, AMAT or PLTR?

Metric tally: AMAT 8 · PLTR 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueAMAT(lower P/E)

GrowthPLTR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityAMAT(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	AMAT	PLTR
P/E ratio	53.31●	142.21
Forward P/E	46.38●	61.52
P/S ratio	15.62●	62.99
P/B ratio	18.96●	38.94
PEG ratio	76.90	1.13●
EV / EBITDA	41.89●	139.60
FCF yield	1.32%●	0.82%

Profitability

Metric	AMAT	PLTR
Gross margin	48.96%	84.07%●
Operating margin	29.51%	38.13%●
Net margin	29.31%	43.67%●
ROE	35.58%●	27.00%
ROIC	21.96%●	17.95%

Dividends

Metric	AMAT	PLTR
Dividend yield	0.34%	—
Payout ratio	21.93%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AMAT	PLTR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.33%	34.11%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	17.13%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	9.02%	94.15%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	34.01%	38.98%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, AMAT or PLTR?: It depends on your goal. value: AMAT (lower P/E); growth: PLTR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: AMAT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AMAT leads 8 to 7.
Is AMAT or PLTR cheaper?: On trailing earnings, AMAT is cheaper: AMAT trades at a 53.31 P/E and PLTR at 142.21.
Which has grown faster, AMAT or PLTR?: Over the past five years, PLTR grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 9.33% CAGR versus PLTR at 34.11%.
Does AMAT or PLTR pay a bigger dividend?: AMAT pays a dividend (0.34% yield) while PLTR does not currently pay one.
Is AMAT or PLTR more profitable?: PLTR runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 29.31% versus PLTR at 43.67%.
Which has been the better investment, AMAT or PLTR?: Over the past 5-year, PLTR delivered the higher annualized total return — AMAT at 38.64% versus PLTR at 38.98%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AMAT analysis Full PLTR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Applied Materials P/E ratio Palantir Technologies P/E ratio Applied Materials dividend yield Palantir Technologies dividend yield Applied Materials ROE Palantir Technologies ROE Applied Materials operating margin Palantir Technologies operating margin Applied Materials revenue growth Palantir Technologies revenue growth Applied Materials free cash flow Palantir Technologies free cash flow

Applied Materials & Palantir Technologies appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.