Which has the lower trailing P/E, AMAT or PLTR?

AMAT has the lower trailing P/E: AMAT trades at 39.35 and PLTR at 141.72. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, AMAT or PLTR?

Over the past five years, PLTR grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 8.81% CAGR versus PLTR at 35.90%.

Does AMAT or PLTR pay a bigger dividend?

AMAT pays a dividend (0.54% yield), while PLTR has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is AMAT or PLTR more profitable?

PLTR runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 30.05% versus PLTR at 49.00%.

How have AMAT and PLTR total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, AMAT delivered 28.17% and PLTR delivered 45.36% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR)

A side-by-side comparison of Applied Materials, Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

AMAT

Applied Materials, Inc.

$362.43B

$456.49TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

PLTR

Palantir Technologies Inc.

$383.97B

$167.23TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — AMAT vs PLTR

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

AMAT +733.8% (+42.4%/yr)PLTR +1684.5% (+61.7%/yr)PLTR compounded faster over this window

AMAT PLTR

AMAT vs PLTR: by the numbers

•PLTR is the larger company ($383.97B vs $362.43B market cap).
•AMAT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (39.35 vs 141.72 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PLTR converts more revenue to profit (49.00% vs 30.05% net margin).
•PLTR grew revenue faster over the past five years (35.90% vs 8.81% CAGR).
•AMAT pays a dividend (0.54% yield), while PLTR has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AMAT	PLTR
P/E ratio	39.35	141.72
Forward P/E	35.62	104.86
P/S ratio	11.75	62.37
P/B ratio	14.14	39.28
EV / EBITDA	36.53	143.52
FCF yield	1.55%	0.87%

Profitability

Metric	AMAT	PLTR
Gross margin	49.40%	84.80%
Operating margin	30.50%	31.59%
Net margin	30.05%	49.00%
ROE	36.16%	30.86%
ROIC	23.58%	25.60%

Dividends

Metric	AMAT	PLTR
Dividend yield	0.54%	N/A
Payout ratio	21.03%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AMAT	PLTR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.81%	35.90%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	17.13%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	5.66%	122.48%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	28.17%	45.36%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, AMAT or PLTR?: AMAT has the lower trailing P/E: AMAT trades at 39.35 and PLTR at 141.72. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, AMAT or PLTR?: Over the past five years, PLTR grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 8.81% CAGR versus PLTR at 35.90%.
Does AMAT or PLTR pay a bigger dividend?: AMAT pays a dividend (0.54% yield), while PLTR has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is AMAT or PLTR more profitable?: PLTR runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 30.05% versus PLTR at 49.00%.
How have AMAT and PLTR total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, AMAT delivered 28.17% and PLTR delivered 45.36% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AMAT analysis Full PLTR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Applied Materials P/E ratio Palantir Technologies P/E ratio Applied Materials dividend yield Applied Materials ROE Palantir Technologies ROE Applied Materials operating margin Palantir Technologies operating margin Applied Materials revenue growth Palantir Technologies revenue growth Applied Materials free cash flow Palantir Technologies free cash flow

Applied Materials & Palantir Technologies appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.