Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR)
A side-by-side comparison of Applied Materials, Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 30, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
$436.45TechnologyAt close: Jul 29, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
$123.00TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — AMAT vs PLTR
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6yAMAT +839.1%PLTR +1200.3%PLTR compounded faster
AMAT PLTR
AMAT vs PLTR: by the numbers
- •AMAT is the larger company ($346.52B vs $282.42B market cap).
- •AMAT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (41.02 vs 137.26 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •PLTR converts more revenue to profit (43.67% vs 29.31% net margin).
- •PLTR grew revenue faster over the past five years (34.11% vs 9.33% CAGR).
- •AMAT pays a dividend (0.44% yield), while PLTR has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AMAT | PLTR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 41.02 | 137.26 |
| Forward P/E | 35.54 | 84.77 |
| P/S ratio | 12.02 | 60.79 |
| P/B ratio | 14.59 | 37.59 |
| PEG ratio | 76.84 | 1.13 |
| EV / EBITDA | 38.55 | 156.33 |
| FCF yield | 1.71% | 0.85% |
Profitability
| Metric | AMAT | PLTR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 84.07% |
| Operating margin | 29.51% | 38.13% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 43.67% |
| ROE | 35.58% | 27.00% |
| ROIC | 21.96% | 17.95% |
Dividends
| Metric | AMAT | PLTR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.44% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 21.93% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AMAT | PLTR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.33% | 34.11% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 17.13% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 9.02% | 94.15% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 27.06% | 40.51% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, AMAT or PLTR?
- AMAT has the lower trailing P/E: AMAT trades at 41.02 and PLTR at 137.26. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, AMAT or PLTR?
- Over the past five years, PLTR grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 9.33% CAGR versus PLTR at 34.11%.
- Does AMAT or PLTR pay a bigger dividend?
- AMAT pays a dividend (0.44% yield), while PLTR has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is AMAT or PLTR more profitable?
- PLTR runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 29.31% versus PLTR at 43.67%.
- How have AMAT and PLTR total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, AMAT delivered 33.89% and PLTR delivered 40.51% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Applied Materials P/E ratioPalantir Technologies P/E ratioApplied Materials dividend yieldPalantir Technologies dividend yieldApplied Materials ROEPalantir Technologies ROEApplied Materials operating marginPalantir Technologies operating marginApplied Materials revenue growthPalantir Technologies revenue growthApplied Materials free cash flowPalantir Technologies free cash flow
Applied Materials & Palantir Technologies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 30, 2026.