Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW)
A side-by-side comparison of Applied Materials, Inc. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 26, 2026. . Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
$536.25TechnologyAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
$323.79TechnologyAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — AMAT vs PANW
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 14yAMAT +6212.7%PANW +3558.6%AMAT compounded faster
AMAT PANW
AMAT vs PANW: by the numbers
- •AMAT is the larger company ($425.76B vs $263.89B market cap).
- •AMAT trades at the lower earnings multiple (50.40 vs 281.56 P/E).
- •AMAT converts more revenue to profit (29.31% vs 7.95% net margin).
- •PANW grew revenue faster over the past five years (21.62% vs 9.33% CAGR).
- •AMAT pays a dividend (0.36% yield), while PANW has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AMAT | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 50.40 | 281.56 |
| Forward P/E | 43.66 | 85.81 |
| P/S ratio | 14.76 | 22.71 |
| P/B ratio | 17.92 | 8.71 |
| PEG ratio | 76.84 | 4.05 |
| EV / EBITDA | 47.37 | 126.30 |
| FCF yield | 1.39% | 1.78% |
Profitability
| Metric | AMAT | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 71.94% |
| Operating margin | 29.51% | 9.65% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 7.95% |
| ROE | 35.58% | 3.05% |
| ROIC | 21.96% | 5.67% |
Dividends
| Metric | AMAT | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 21.93% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AMAT | PANW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.33% | 21.62% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 17.13% | 69.46% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 9.02% | 25.30% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 32.20% | 37.04% |
Frequently asked
- Is AMAT or PANW cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, AMAT is cheaper: AMAT trades at a 50.40 P/E and PANW at 281.56.
- Which has grown faster, AMAT or PANW?
- Over the past five years, PANW grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 9.33% CAGR versus PANW at 21.62%.
- Does AMAT or PANW pay a bigger dividend?
- AMAT pays a dividend (0.36% yield), while PANW has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is AMAT or PANW more profitable?
- AMAT runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 29.31% versus PANW at 7.95%.
- How have AMAT and PANW total returns compared?
- Over the past 10-year, AMAT delivered 36.62% and PANW delivered 31.09% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Applied Materials P/E ratioPalo Alto Networks P/E ratioApplied Materials dividend yieldPalo Alto Networks dividend yieldApplied Materials ROEPalo Alto Networks ROEApplied Materials operating marginPalo Alto Networks operating marginApplied Materials revenue growthPalo Alto Networks revenue growthApplied Materials free cash flowPalo Alto Networks free cash flow
Applied Materials & Palo Alto Networks appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 26, 2026.