Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)
A side-by-side comparison of Applied Materials, Inc. and Netflix, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: AMAT is classified in Technology; NFLX is classified in Communication Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
$476.46TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
$72.39Communication ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — AMAT vs NFLX
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 24yAMAT +2536.7%NFLX +58743.2%NFLX compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
AMAT NFLX
AMAT vs NFLX: by the numbers
- •AMAT is the larger company ($378.29B vs $301.43B market cap).
- •NFLX trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (22.14 vs 48.58 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •AMAT converts more revenue to profit (29.31% vs 28.22% net margin).
- •NFLX grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.89% vs 9.33% CAGR).
- •AMAT pays a dividend (0.37% yield), while NFLX has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AMAT | NFLX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 48.58 | 22.14 |
| Forward P/E | 42.09 | 19.58 |
| P/S ratio | 14.23 | 6.20 |
| P/B ratio | 17.27 | 9.95 |
| PEG ratio | 76.84 | 1.34 |
| EV / EBITDA | 45.66 | 11.05 |
| FCF yield | 1.44% | 3.66% |
Profitability
| Metric | AMAT | NFLX |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 49.12% |
| Operating margin | 29.51% | 29.68% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 28.22% |
| ROE | 35.58% | 45.27% |
| ROIC | 21.96% | 25.22% |
Dividends
| Metric | AMAT | NFLX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.37% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 21.93% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AMAT | NFLX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.33% | 11.89% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 17.13% | 32.58% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 9.02% | 51.23% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 31.94% | 6.29% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, AMAT or NFLX?
- NFLX has the lower trailing P/E: AMAT trades at 48.58 and NFLX at 22.14. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, AMAT or NFLX?
- Over the past five years, NFLX grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 9.33% CAGR versus NFLX at 11.89%.
- Does AMAT or NFLX pay a bigger dividend?
- AMAT pays a dividend (0.37% yield), while NFLX has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is AMAT or NFLX more profitable?
- AMAT runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 29.31% versus NFLX at 28.22%.
- How have AMAT and NFLX total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, AMAT delivered 35.87% and NFLX delivered 22.57% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Applied Materials P/E ratioNetflix P/E ratioApplied Materials dividend yieldNetflix dividend yieldApplied Materials ROENetflix ROEApplied Materials operating marginNetflix operating marginApplied Materials revenue growthNetflix revenue growthApplied Materials free cash flowNetflix free cash flow
Applied Materials & Netflix appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.