Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs The Kroger Co. (KR)
A side-by-side comparison of Applied Materials, Inc. and The Kroger Co. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: AMAT is classified in Technology; KR is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
$476.46TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
KR
The Kroger Co.
$59.19Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — AMAT vs KR
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yAMAT +24231.5%KR +1577.9%AMAT compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
AMAT KR
AMAT vs KR: by the numbers
- •AMAT is the larger company ($378.29B vs $36.26B market cap).
- •KR trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.91 vs 48.58 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •AMAT converts more revenue to profit (29.31% vs 0.71% net margin).
- •AMAT grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.33% vs 2.33% CAGR).
- •KR pays the higher dividend yield (2.41% vs 0.37%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AMAT | KR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 48.58 | 33.91 |
| Forward P/E | 42.09 | 12.07 |
| P/S ratio | 14.23 | 0.24 |
| P/B ratio | 17.27 | 5.51 |
| PEG ratio | 76.84 | N/A |
| EV / EBITDA | 45.66 | 10.44 |
| FCF yield | 1.44% | 8.09% |
Profitability
| Metric | AMAT | KR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 23.18% |
| Operating margin | 29.51% | 1.33% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 0.71% |
| ROE | 35.58% | 16.27% |
| ROIC | 21.96% | 4.70% |
Dividends
| Metric | AMAT | KR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.37% | 2.41% |
| Payout ratio | 21.93% | 89.74% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AMAT | KR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.33% | 2.33% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 17.13% | -13.96% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 9.02% | -1.62% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 31.94% | 10.73% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, AMAT or KR?
- KR has the lower trailing P/E: AMAT trades at 48.58 and KR at 33.91. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, AMAT or KR?
- Over the past five years, AMAT grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 9.33% CAGR versus KR at 2.33%.
- Does AMAT or KR pay a bigger dividend?
- AMAT yields 0.37% and KR yields 2.41% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AMAT or KR more profitable?
- AMAT runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 29.31% versus KR at 0.71%.
- How have AMAT and KR total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, AMAT delivered 35.87% and KR delivered 7.90% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Applied Materials P/E ratioKroger P/E ratioApplied Materials dividend yieldKroger dividend yieldApplied Materials ROEKroger ROEApplied Materials operating marginKroger operating marginApplied Materials revenue growthKroger revenue growthApplied Materials free cash flowKroger free cash flow
Applied Materials & Kroger appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.