Is AMAT or CSCO cheaper?

On trailing earnings, CSCO is cheaper: AMAT trades at a 53.31 P/E and CSCO at 40.37.

Which has grown faster, AMAT or CSCO?

Over the past five years, AMAT grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 9.33% CAGR versus CSCO at 4.58%.

Does AMAT or CSCO pay a bigger dividend?

AMAT yields 0.34% and CSCO yields 1.36% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is AMAT or CSCO more profitable?

AMAT runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 29.31% versus CSCO at 19.69%.

Which has been the better investment, AMAT or CSCO?

Over the past 10-year, AMAT delivered the higher annualized total return — AMAT at 38.64% versus CSCO at 18.88%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)

CSCO leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Applied Materials, Inc. and Cisco Systems, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

AMAT

Applied Materials, Inc.

Total return — AMAT vs CSCO

growth of $100 · last 30y

AMAT +12762.8%CSCO +1850.1%AMAT compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

AMAT CSCO

AMAT vs CSCO: by the numbers

•CSCO is the larger company ($477.31B vs $450.37B market cap).
•CSCO trades at the lower earnings multiple (40.37 vs 53.31 P/E).
•AMAT converts more revenue to profit (29.31% vs 19.69% net margin).
•AMAT grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.33% vs 4.58% CAGR).
•CSCO pays the higher dividend yield (1.36% vs 0.34%).

Which is better, AMAT or CSCO?

Metric tally: AMAT 8 · CSCO 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueCSCO(lower P/E)

GrowthAMAT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeCSCO(higher dividend yield)

QualityAMAT(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	AMAT	CSCO
P/E ratio	53.31	40.37●
Forward P/E	46.38	28.33●
P/S ratio	15.62	7.95●
P/B ratio	18.96	9.88●
PEG ratio	76.90	68.41●
EV / EBITDA	42.42	29.07●
FCF yield	1.32%	2.61%●

Profitability

Metric	AMAT	CSCO
Gross margin	48.96%	64.33%●
Operating margin	29.51%●	23.36%
Net margin	29.31%●	19.69%
ROE	35.58%●	24.47%
ROIC	21.96%●	11.66%

Dividends

Metric	AMAT	CSCO
Dividend yield	0.34%	1.36%●
Payout ratio	21.93%	64.45%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AMAT	CSCO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.33%●	4.58%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	17.13%●	-0.69%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	9.02%●	-2.45%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	34.01%●	20.60%

Frequently asked

Which is better, AMAT or CSCO?: It depends on your goal. value: CSCO (lower P/E); growth: AMAT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CSCO (higher dividend yield); quality: AMAT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CSCO leads 9 to 8.
Is AMAT or CSCO cheaper?: On trailing earnings, CSCO is cheaper: AMAT trades at a 53.31 P/E and CSCO at 40.37.
Which has grown faster, AMAT or CSCO?: Over the past five years, AMAT grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 9.33% CAGR versus CSCO at 4.58%.
Does AMAT or CSCO pay a bigger dividend?: AMAT yields 0.34% and CSCO yields 1.36% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is AMAT or CSCO more profitable?: AMAT runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 29.31% versus CSCO at 19.69%.
Which has been the better investment, AMAT or CSCO?: Over the past 10-year, AMAT delivered the higher annualized total return — AMAT at 38.64% versus CSCO at 18.88%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AMAT analysis Full CSCO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Applied Materials P/E ratio Cisco Systems P/E ratio Applied Materials dividend yield Cisco Systems dividend yield Applied Materials ROE Cisco Systems ROE Applied Materials operating margin Cisco Systems operating margin Applied Materials revenue growth Cisco Systems revenue growth Applied Materials free cash flow Cisco Systems free cash flow

Applied Materials & Cisco Systems appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks Largest Companies by Market Cap

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.