Which has the lower trailing P/E, AMAT or CRWD?

AMAT has the lower trailing P/E: AMAT trades at 36.15 and CRWD at 6849.86. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, AMAT or CRWD?

Over the past five years, CRWD grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 8.81% CAGR versus CRWD at 36.53%.

Does AMAT or CRWD pay a bigger dividend?

AMAT pays a dividend (0.43% yield), while CRWD has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is AMAT or CRWD more profitable?

AMAT runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 30.05% versus CRWD at 1.08%.

How have AMAT and CRWD total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, AMAT delivered 28.29% and CRWD delivered 25.83% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD)

A side-by-side comparison of Applied Materials, Inc. and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

AMAT

Applied Materials, Inc.

$332.97B

$419.38TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 15, 2026, 3:15 PM EDT

CRWD

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.

$244.82B

$240.43TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 15, 2026, 3:15 PM EDT

Total return — AMAT vs CRWD

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7y

AMAT +1109.0% (+42.8%/yr)CRWD +1325.8% (+46.2%/yr)CRWD compounded faster over this window

AMAT CRWD

AMAT vs CRWD: by the numbers

•AMAT is the larger company ($332.97B vs $244.82B market cap).
•AMAT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (36.15 vs 6849.86 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•AMAT converts more revenue to profit (30.05% vs 1.08% net margin).
•CRWD grew revenue faster over the past five years (36.53% vs 8.81% CAGR).
•AMAT pays a dividend (0.43% yield), while CRWD has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AMAT	CRWD
P/E ratio	36.15	6849.86
Forward P/E	32.73	N/A
P/S ratio	10.80	45.37
P/B ratio	12.99	47.99
EV / EBITDA	33.57	1128.89
FCF yield	1.69%	0.64%

Profitability

Metric	AMAT	CRWD
Gross margin	49.40%	75.25%
Operating margin	30.50%	-2.21%
Net margin	30.05%	1.08%
ROE	36.16%	1.15%
ROIC	23.58%	-1.57%

Dividends

Metric	AMAT	CRWD
Dividend yield	0.43%	N/A
Payout ratio	17.07%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AMAT	CRWD
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.81%	36.53%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	17.13%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	5.66%	33.99%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	28.29%	25.83%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, AMAT or CRWD?: AMAT has the lower trailing P/E: AMAT trades at 36.15 and CRWD at 6849.86. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, AMAT or CRWD?: Over the past five years, CRWD grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 8.81% CAGR versus CRWD at 36.53%.
Does AMAT or CRWD pay a bigger dividend?: AMAT pays a dividend (0.43% yield), while CRWD has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is AMAT or CRWD more profitable?: AMAT runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 30.05% versus CRWD at 1.08%.
How have AMAT and CRWD total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, AMAT delivered 28.29% and CRWD delivered 25.83% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AMAT analysis Full CRWD analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Applied Materials P/E ratio CrowdStrike P/E ratio Applied Materials dividend yield Applied Materials ROE CrowdStrike ROE Applied Materials operating margin CrowdStrike operating margin Applied Materials revenue growth CrowdStrike revenue growth Applied Materials free cash flow CrowdStrike free cash flow

Applied Materials & CrowdStrike appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.