Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs ASML Holding N.V. (ASML)
A side-by-side comparison of Applied Materials, Inc. and ASML Holding N.V. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 5, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
$534.24TechnologyDelayed quote: Aug 5, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
$1,678.22TechnologyDelayed quote: Aug 5, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — AMAT vs ASML
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yAMAT +25285.6%ASML +39416.2%ASML compounded faster
AMAT ASML
AMAT vs ASML: by the numbers
- •ASML is the larger company ($646.82B vs $424.16B market cap).
- •AMAT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (51.37 vs 52.50 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •ASML converts more revenue to profit (30.10% vs 29.31% net margin).
- •ASML grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.77% vs 9.33% CAGR).
- •ASML pays the higher dividend yield (0.53% vs 0.35%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AMAT | ASML |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 51.37 | 52.50 |
| Forward P/E | 44.51 | 44.02 |
| P/S ratio | 15.05 | 15.75 |
| P/B ratio | 18.27 | 25.91 |
| PEG ratio | 76.84 | 1.29 |
| EV / EBITDA | 48.28 | 40.73 |
| FCF yield | 1.37% | 1.75% |
Profitability
| Metric | AMAT | ASML |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 52.72% |
| Operating margin | 29.51% | 35.41% |
| Net margin | 29.31% | 30.10% |
| ROE | 35.58% | 49.52% |
| ROIC | 21.96% | 35.54% |
Dividends
| Metric | AMAT | ASML |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | 0.53% |
| Payout ratio | 21.93% | 30.36% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AMAT | ASML |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.33% | 15.77% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 17.13% | 24.63% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 9.02% | 8.44% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 31.92% | 17.21% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, AMAT or ASML?
- AMAT has the lower trailing P/E: AMAT trades at 51.37 and ASML at 52.50. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, AMAT or ASML?
- Over the past five years, ASML grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 9.33% CAGR versus ASML at 15.77%.
- Does AMAT or ASML pay a bigger dividend?
- AMAT yields 0.35% and ASML yields 0.53% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AMAT or ASML more profitable?
- ASML runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 29.31% versus ASML at 30.10%.
- How have AMAT and ASML total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, AMAT delivered 36.90% and ASML delivered 32.60% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Applied Materials P/E ratioASML P/E ratioApplied Materials dividend yieldASML dividend yieldApplied Materials ROEASML ROEApplied Materials operating marginASML operating marginApplied Materials revenue growthASML revenue growthApplied Materials free cash flowASML free cash flow
Applied Materials & ASML appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 5, 2026.