Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs ASML Holding N.V. (ASML)

ASML leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics, though AMAT is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Applied Materials, Inc. and ASML Holding N.V. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Compare
Applied Materials, Inc. logo
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
$489.96B
$617.11Technology
ASML Holding N.V. logo
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
$743.73B
$1929.68Technology

Total return — AMAT vs ASML

growth of $100 · last 30y
AMAT +15562.7%ASML +36726.0%ASML compounded faster
010k20k30kStart $100200120062011201620212026$15,663$36,826
AMAT ASML

AMAT vs ASML: by the numbers

  • •ASML is the larger company ($743.73B vs $489.96B market cap).
  • •AMAT trades at the lower earnings multiple (58.00 vs 63.76 P/E).
  • •ASML converts more revenue to profit (29.71% vs 29.31% net margin).
  • •ASML grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.10% vs 9.33% CAGR).
  • •ASML pays the higher dividend yield (0.46% vs 0.31%).

Which is better, AMAT or ASML?

Metric tally: AMAT 5 · ASML 11

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueAMAT(lower P/E)
GrowthASML(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityASML(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricAMATASML
P/E ratio58.00●63.76
Forward P/E50.4444.43●
P/S ratio16.99●18.88
P/B ratio20.62●30.93
PEG ratio76.841.29●
EV / EBITDA44.26●47.28
FCF yield1.21%1.36%●

Profitability

MetricAMATASML
Gross margin48.96%52.60%●
Operating margin29.51%34.78%●
Net margin29.31%29.71%
ROE35.58%48.67%●
ROIC21.96%35.54%●

Dividends

MetricAMATASML
Dividend yield0.31%0.46%●
Payout ratio21.93%30.25%

Growth (annualized)

MetricAMATASML
Revenue CAGR (5Y)9.33%16.10%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)17.13%24.63%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)9.02%22.12%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)37.45%●24.67%

Frequently asked

Which is better, AMAT or ASML?
It depends on your goal. value: AMAT (lower P/E); growth: ASML (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ASML (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ASML leads 11 to 5.
Is AMAT or ASML cheaper?
On trailing earnings, AMAT is cheaper: AMAT trades at a 58.00 P/E and ASML at 63.76.
Which has grown faster, AMAT or ASML?
Over the past five years, ASML grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 9.33% CAGR versus ASML at 16.10%.
Does AMAT or ASML pay a bigger dividend?
AMAT yields 0.31% and ASML yields 0.46% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is AMAT or ASML more profitable?
ASML runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 29.31% versus ASML at 29.71%.
Which has been the better investment, AMAT or ASML?
Over the past 10-year, AMAT delivered the higher annualized total return — AMAT at 40.21% versus ASML at 36.43%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AMAT analysisFull ASML analysisInteractive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Applied Materials P/E ratioASML P/E ratioApplied Materials dividend yieldASML dividend yieldApplied Materials ROEASML ROEApplied Materials operating marginASML operating marginApplied Materials revenue growthASML revenue growthApplied Materials free cash flowASML free cash flow

Applied Materials & ASML appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth StocksHighest ROE StocksHighest ROIC StocksHighest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 20, 2026.