Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) vs Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares (ARM)
AMAT leads on 11 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Applied Materials, Inc. and Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
$567.25Technology
ARM
Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares
$380.81Technology
Total return — AMAT vs ARM
growth of $100 · last 3yAMAT +310.3%ARM +526.8%ARM compounded faster
AMAT ARM
AMAT vs ARM: by the numbers
- •AMAT is the larger company ($450.37B vs $405.18B market cap).
- •AMAT trades at the lower earnings multiple (53.31 vs 453.35 P/E).
- •AMAT converts more revenue to profit (29.31% vs 18.37% net margin).
- •ARM grew revenue faster over the past five years (19.41% vs 9.33% CAGR).
- •AMAT pays a dividend (0.34% yield) while ARM does not currently pay one.
Which is better, AMAT or ARM?
Metric tally: AMAT 11 · ARM 3It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueAMAT(lower P/E)
GrowthARM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityAMAT(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | AMAT | ARM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 53.31● | 453.35 |
| Forward P/E | 46.38● | 126.31 |
| P/S ratio | 15.62● | 82.66 |
| P/B ratio | 18.96● | 49.08 |
| PEG ratio | 76.90 | 13.32● |
| EV / EBITDA | 42.42● | 287.61 |
| FCF yield | 1.32%● | 0.24% |
Profitability
| Metric | AMAT | ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.96% | 94.63%● |
| Operating margin | 29.51%● | 18.31% |
| Net margin | 29.31%● | 18.37% |
| ROE | 35.58%● | 10.91% |
| ROIC | 21.96%● | 7.31% |
Dividends
| Metric | AMAT | ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.34% | — |
| Payout ratio | 21.93% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AMAT | ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.33% | 19.41%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 17.13% | 17.47% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 9.02%● | -1.73% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 34.01% | — |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AMAT or ARM?
- It depends on your goal. value: AMAT (lower P/E); growth: ARM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: AMAT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AMAT leads 11 to 3.
- Is AMAT or ARM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, AMAT is cheaper: AMAT trades at a 53.31 P/E and ARM at 453.35.
- Which has grown faster, AMAT or ARM?
- Over the past five years, ARM grew revenue faster — AMAT at a 9.33% CAGR versus ARM at 19.41%.
- Does AMAT or ARM pay a bigger dividend?
- AMAT pays a dividend (0.34% yield) while ARM does not currently pay one.
- Is AMAT or ARM more profitable?
- AMAT runs the higher net margin — AMAT at 29.31% versus ARM at 18.37%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Applied Materials P/E ratioArm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares P/E ratioApplied Materials dividend yieldArm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares dividend yieldApplied Materials ROEArm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares ROEApplied Materials operating marginArm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares operating marginApplied Materials revenue growthArm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares revenue growthApplied Materials free cash flowArm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares free cash flow
Applied Materials & Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.