Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) vs Weatherford International plc (WFRD)
WFRD leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Antero Midstream Corporation and Weatherford International plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AM
Antero Midstream Corporation
$21.67Energy
WFRD
Weatherford International plc
$101.31Energy
Total return — AM vs WFRD
growth of $100 · last 6yAM +212.7%WFRD +313.5%WFRD compounded faster
AM WFRD
AM vs WFRD: by the numbers
- •AM is the larger company ($10.29B vs $7.29B market cap).
- •WFRD trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.85 vs 25.20 P/E).
- •AM converts more revenue to profit (31.94% vs 9.49% net margin).
- •WFRD grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.11% vs 5.93% CAGR).
- •AM pays the higher dividend yield (4.15% vs 1.04%).
Which is better, AM or WFRD?
Metric tally: AM 6 · WFRD 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueWFRD(lower P/E)
GrowthWFRD(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeAM(higher dividend yield)
QualityWFRD(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AM | WFRD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 25.20 | 15.85● |
| Forward P/E | 17.03 | 17.16 |
| P/S ratio | 8.06 | 1.50● |
| P/B ratio | 5.35 | 4.16● |
| PEG ratio | 5.69 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.51 | 8.12● |
| FCF yield | 8.84%● | 6.37% |
Profitability
| Metric | AM | WFRD |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 64.52%● | 45.89% |
| Operating margin | 57.56%● | 15.11% |
| Net margin | 31.94%● | 9.49% |
| ROE | 21.21% | 26.34%● |
| ROIC | 8.18% | 16.68%● |
Dividends
| Metric | AM | WFRD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.15%● | 1.04% |
| Payout ratio | 104.65% | 17.62% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AM | WFRD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.93% | 8.11%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -13.48%● | -30.28% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.24% | 30.53%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 24.03% | 45.91%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AM or WFRD?
- It depends on your goal. value: WFRD (lower P/E); growth: WFRD (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: AM (higher dividend yield); quality: WFRD (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, WFRD leads 9 to 6.
- Is AM or WFRD cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, WFRD is cheaper: AM trades at a 25.20 P/E and WFRD at 15.85.
- Which has grown faster, AM or WFRD?
- Over the past five years, WFRD grew revenue faster — AM at a 5.93% CAGR versus WFRD at 8.11%.
- Does AM or WFRD pay a bigger dividend?
- AM yields 4.15% and WFRD yields 1.04% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AM or WFRD more profitable?
- AM runs the higher net margin — AM at 31.94% versus WFRD at 9.49%.
- Which has been the better investment, AM or WFRD?
- Over the past 5-year, WFRD delivered the higher annualized total return — AM at 24.03% versus WFRD at 45.91%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Antero Midstream P/E ratioWeatherford International P/E ratioAntero Midstream dividend yieldWeatherford International dividend yieldAntero Midstream ROEWeatherford International ROEAntero Midstream operating marginWeatherford International operating marginAntero Midstream revenue growthWeatherford International revenue growthAntero Midstream free cash flowWeatherford International free cash flow
Antero Midstream & Weatherford International appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.