Which has grown faster, AM or HP?

Over the past five years, HP grew revenue faster — AM at a 5.71% CAGR versus HP at 30.24%.

Does AM or HP pay a bigger dividend?

AM yields 4.10% and HP yields 2.96% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is AM or HP more profitable?

AM runs the higher net margin — AM at 30.99% versus HP at -9.39%.

How have AM and HP total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, AM delivered 26.61% and HP delivered -1.11% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) vs Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (HP)

A side-by-side comparison of Antero Midstream Corporation and Helmerich & Payne, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 31, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Antero Midstream Corporation

$10.43B

$21.97EnergyDelayed quote: Jul 31, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Helmerich & Payne, Inc.

$3.45B

$34.57EnergyDelayed quote: Jul 31, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — AM vs HP

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 9y

AM +44.3%HP -8.7%AM compounded faster

AM HP

AM vs HP: by the numbers

•AM is the larger company ($10.43B vs $3.45B market cap).
•AM is profitable (30.99% net margin) while HP runs a net loss (-9.39%).
•HP grew revenue faster over the past five years (30.24% vs 5.71% CAGR).
•AM pays the higher dividend yield (4.10% vs 2.96%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AM	HP
P/E ratio	26.15	N/A
Forward P/E	19.75	N/A
P/S ratio	8.13	0.84
P/B ratio	5.39	1.33
PEG ratio	5.72	N/A
EV / EBITDA	15.75	7.87
FCF yield	9.35%	7.59%

Profitability

Metric	AM	HP
Gross margin	65.30%	11.29%
Operating margin	57.03%	6.20%
Net margin	30.99%	-9.39%
ROE	20.55%	-14.86%
ROIC	8.18%	3.92%

Dividends

Metric	AM	HP
Dividend yield	4.10%	2.96%
Payout ratio	104.65%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AM	HP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.71%	30.24%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	9.87%	-2.32%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	26.61%	7.97%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, AM or HP?: Over the past five years, HP grew revenue faster — AM at a 5.71% CAGR versus HP at 30.24%.
Does AM or HP pay a bigger dividend?: AM yields 4.10% and HP yields 2.96% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is AM or HP more profitable?: AM runs the higher net margin — AM at 30.99% versus HP at -9.39%.
How have AM and HP total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, AM delivered 26.61% and HP delivered -1.11% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AM analysis Full HP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Antero Midstream P/E ratio Helmerich & Payne P/E ratio Antero Midstream dividend yield Helmerich & Payne dividend yield Antero Midstream ROE Helmerich & Payne ROE Antero Midstream operating margin Helmerich & Payne operating margin Antero Midstream revenue growth Helmerich & Payne revenue growth Antero Midstream free cash flow Helmerich & Payne free cash flow

Antero Midstream & Helmerich & Payne appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 31, 2026.