Which has grown faster, AM or HP?

Over the past five years, HP grew revenue faster — AM at a 5.93% CAGR versus HP at 30.24%.

Does AM or HP pay a bigger dividend?

AM yields 4.15% and HP yields 2.55% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is AM or HP more profitable?

AM runs the higher net margin — AM at 31.94% versus HP at -9.39%.

Which has been the better investment, AM or HP?

Over the past 5-year, AM delivered the higher annualized total return — AM at 24.03% versus HP at -0.26%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) vs Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (HP)

AM leads on 10 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Antero Midstream Corporation and Helmerich & Payne, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Antero Midstream Corporation

$10.29B

$21.67Energy

Helmerich & Payne, Inc.

$3.92B

$39.25Energy

Total return — AM vs HP

growth of $100 · last 9y

AM -1.5%HP -32.4%AM compounded faster

AM HP

AM vs HP: by the numbers

•AM is the larger company ($10.29B vs $3.92B market cap).
•AM is profitable (31.94% net margin) while HP runs a net loss (-9.39%).
•HP grew revenue faster over the past five years (30.24% vs 5.93% CAGR).
•AM pays the higher dividend yield (4.15% vs 2.55%).

Which is better, AM or HP?

Metric tally: AM 10 · HP 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthHP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeAM(higher dividend yield)

QualityAM(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	AM	HP
P/E ratio	25.20	—
Forward P/E	17.03●	24.86
P/S ratio	8.06	0.98●
P/B ratio	5.35	1.55●
PEG ratio	5.69	—
EV / EBITDA	14.51	11.12●
FCF yield	8.84%●	6.53%

Profitability

Metric	AM	HP
Gross margin	64.52%●	11.29%
Operating margin	57.56%●	-1.85%
Net margin	31.94%●	-9.39%
ROE	21.21%●	-14.86%
ROIC	8.18%●	3.92%

Dividends

Metric	AM	HP
Dividend yield	4.15%●	2.55%
Payout ratio	104.65%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AM	HP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.93%	30.24%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-13.48%	-4.17%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	7.24%●	-2.32%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	24.03%●	7.73%

Frequently asked

Which is better, AM or HP?: It depends on your goal. growth: HP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: AM (higher dividend yield); quality: AM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AM leads 10 to 5.
Which has grown faster, AM or HP?: Over the past five years, HP grew revenue faster — AM at a 5.93% CAGR versus HP at 30.24%.
Does AM or HP pay a bigger dividend?: AM yields 4.15% and HP yields 2.55% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is AM or HP more profitable?: AM runs the higher net margin — AM at 31.94% versus HP at -9.39%.
Which has been the better investment, AM or HP?: Over the past 5-year, AM delivered the higher annualized total return — AM at 24.03% versus HP at -0.26%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AM analysis Full HP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Antero Midstream P/E ratio Helmerich & Payne P/E ratio Antero Midstream dividend yield Helmerich & Payne dividend yield Antero Midstream ROE Helmerich & Payne ROE Antero Midstream operating margin Helmerich & Payne operating margin Antero Midstream revenue growth Helmerich & Payne revenue growth Antero Midstream free cash flow Helmerich & Payne free cash flow

Antero Midstream & Helmerich & Payne appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.