Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) vs Halliburton Company (HAL)
AM and HAL are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.
A side-by-side comparison of Antero Midstream Corporation and Halliburton Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — AM vs HAL
growth of $100 · last 9yAM -34.2%HAL -22.4%HAL compounded faster
AM HAL
AM vs HAL: by the numbers
- •HAL is the larger company ($29.33B vs $10.55B market cap).
- •HAL trades at the lower earnings multiple (19.28 vs 25.83 P/E).
- •AM converts more revenue to profit (31.94% vs 6.95% net margin).
- •HAL grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.51% vs 5.93% CAGR).
- •AM pays the higher dividend yield (4.05% vs 1.94%).
Which is better, AM or HAL?
Metric tally: AM 8 · HAL 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueHAL(lower P/E)
GrowthHAL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeAM(higher dividend yield)
QualityHAL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AM | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 25.83 | 19.28● |
| Forward P/E | 17.45 | 12.08● |
| P/S ratio | 8.26 | 1.33● |
| P/B ratio | 5.48 | 2.72● |
| PEG ratio | 5.72 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.78 | 8.64● |
| FCF yield | 8.63%● | 5.69% |
Profitability
| Metric | AM | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 64.52%● | 15.31% |
| Operating margin | 57.56%● | 11.31% |
| Net margin | 31.94%● | 6.95% |
| ROE | 21.21%● | 14.23% |
| ROIC | 8.18% | 8.38%● |
Dividends
| Metric | AM | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.05%● | 1.94% |
| Payout ratio | 104.65% | 45.03% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AM | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.93% | 11.51%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -13.48% | -3.16%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.24%● | 6.24% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 25.35%● | 10.45% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AM or HAL?
- It depends on your goal. value: HAL (lower P/E); growth: HAL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: AM (higher dividend yield); quality: HAL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is AM or HAL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, HAL is cheaper: AM trades at a 25.83 P/E and HAL at 19.28.
- Which has grown faster, AM or HAL?
- Over the past five years, HAL grew revenue faster — AM at a 5.93% CAGR versus HAL at 11.51%.
- Does AM or HAL pay a bigger dividend?
- AM yields 4.05% and HAL yields 1.94% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AM or HAL more profitable?
- AM runs the higher net margin — AM at 31.94% versus HAL at 6.95%.
- Which has been the better investment, AM or HAL?
- Over the past 5-year, AM delivered the higher annualized total return — AM at 25.35% versus HAL at -0.73%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Antero Midstream P/E ratioHalliburton P/E ratioAntero Midstream dividend yieldHalliburton dividend yieldAntero Midstream ROEHalliburton ROEAntero Midstream operating marginHalliburton operating marginAntero Midstream revenue growthHalliburton revenue growthAntero Midstream free cash flowHalliburton free cash flow
Antero Midstream & Halliburton appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.