Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) vs First Solar, Inc. (FSLR)
FSLR leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Antero Midstream Corporation and First Solar, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — AM vs FSLR
growth of $100 · last 9yAM -32.8%FSLR +633.2%FSLR compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
AM FSLR
AM vs FSLR: by the numbers
- •FSLR is the larger company ($26.72B vs $10.78B market cap).
- •FSLR trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.06 vs 25.76 P/E).
- •AM converts more revenue to profit (31.94% vs 30.73% net margin).
- •FSLR grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.69% vs 5.93% CAGR).
- •AM pays a dividend (4.06% yield) while FSLR does not currently pay one.
Which is better, AM or FSLR?
Metric tally: AM 6 · FSLR 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueFSLR(lower P/E)
GrowthFSLR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityFSLR(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AM | FSLR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 25.76 | 16.06● |
| Forward P/E | 17.40 | 10.33● |
| P/S ratio | 8.23 | 4.94● |
| P/B ratio | 5.47 | 2.71● |
| PEG ratio | 5.72 | 1.01● |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.75 | 10.74● |
| FCF yield | 8.65%● | 6.23% |
Profitability
| Metric | AM | FSLR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 64.52%● | 41.73% |
| Operating margin | 57.56%● | 33.17% |
| Net margin | 31.94%● | 30.73% |
| ROE | 21.21%● | 16.86% |
| ROIC | 8.18% | 14.42%● |
Dividends
| Metric | AM | FSLR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.06% | — |
| Payout ratio | 104.65% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AM | FSLR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.93% | 12.69%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -13.48% | 30.54%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.24% | 55.54%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 25.13%● | 23.13% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AM or FSLR?
- It depends on your goal. value: FSLR (lower P/E); growth: FSLR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: FSLR (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FSLR leads 10 to 6.
- Is AM or FSLR cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, FSLR is cheaper: AM trades at a 25.76 P/E and FSLR at 16.06.
- Which has grown faster, AM or FSLR?
- Over the past five years, FSLR grew revenue faster — AM at a 5.93% CAGR versus FSLR at 12.69%.
- Does AM or FSLR pay a bigger dividend?
- AM pays a dividend (4.06% yield) while FSLR does not currently pay one.
- Is AM or FSLR more profitable?
- AM runs the higher net margin — AM at 31.94% versus FSLR at 30.73%.
- Which has been the better investment, AM or FSLR?
- Over the past 5-year, AM delivered the higher annualized total return — AM at 25.13% versus FSLR at 18.37%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Antero Midstream P/E ratioFirst Solar P/E ratioAntero Midstream dividend yieldFirst Solar dividend yieldAntero Midstream ROEFirst Solar ROEAntero Midstream operating marginFirst Solar operating marginAntero Midstream revenue growthFirst Solar revenue growthAntero Midstream free cash flowFirst Solar free cash flow
Antero Midstream & First Solar appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.