Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) vs California Resources Corporation (CRC)
AM leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Antero Midstream Corporation and California Resources Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AM
Antero Midstream Corporation
$21.67Energy
CRC
California Resources Corporation
$58.61Energy
Total return — AM vs CRC
growth of $100 · last 9yAM -35.8%CRC +419.1%CRC compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
AM CRC
AM vs CRC: by the numbers
- •AM is the larger company ($10.29B vs $5.20B market cap).
- •AM is profitable (31.94% net margin) while CRC runs a net loss (-13.09%).
- •CRC grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.91% vs 5.93% CAGR).
- •AM pays the higher dividend yield (4.15% vs 2.73%).
Which is better, AM or CRC?
Metric tally: AM 9 · CRC 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthCRC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeAM(higher dividend yield)
QualityCRC(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AM | CRC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 25.20 | — |
| Forward P/E | 17.03 | 13.17● |
| P/S ratio | 8.06 | 1.47● |
| P/B ratio | 5.35 | 1.78● |
| PEG ratio | 5.69 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.51● | 20.88 |
| FCF yield | 8.84%● | 7.50% |
Profitability
| Metric | AM | CRC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 64.52%● | 37.83% |
| Operating margin | 57.56%● | 20.70% |
| Net margin | 31.94%● | -13.09% |
| ROE | 21.21%● | -15.87% |
| ROIC | 8.18% | 9.67%● |
Dividends
| Metric | AM | CRC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.15%● | 2.73% |
| Payout ratio | 104.65% | 38.43% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AM | CRC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.93% | 15.91%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -13.48%● | -28.68% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.24% | 43.34%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 24.03%● | 14.72% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AM or CRC?
- It depends on your goal. growth: CRC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: AM (higher dividend yield); quality: CRC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AM leads 9 to 6.
- Which has grown faster, AM or CRC?
- Over the past five years, CRC grew revenue faster — AM at a 5.93% CAGR versus CRC at 15.91%.
- Does AM or CRC pay a bigger dividend?
- AM yields 4.15% and CRC yields 2.73% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AM or CRC more profitable?
- AM runs the higher net margin — AM at 31.94% versus CRC at -13.09%.
- Which has been the better investment, AM or CRC?
- Over the past 5-year, AM delivered the higher annualized total return — AM at 24.03% versus CRC at 16.69%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Antero Midstream P/E ratioCalifornia Resources P/E ratioAntero Midstream dividend yieldCalifornia Resources dividend yieldAntero Midstream ROECalifornia Resources ROEAntero Midstream operating marginCalifornia Resources operating marginAntero Midstream revenue growthCalifornia Resources revenue growthAntero Midstream free cash flowCalifornia Resources free cash flow
Antero Midstream & California Resources appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.