Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) vs BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT)
A side-by-side comparison of Antero Midstream Corporation and BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: AM is classified in Energy; BGT is classified in Financial Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
AM
Antero Midstream Corporation
$22.06EnergyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
BGT
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust
$10.99Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — AM vs BGT
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 9yAM +50.4% (+4.6%/yr)BGT +65.2% (+5.7%/yr)BGT compounded faster over this window
AM BGT
AM vs BGT: by the numbers
- •AM is the larger company ($10.47B vs $328M market cap).
- •BGT converts more revenue to profit (73.11% vs 30.45% net margin).
- •AM grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.09% vs 1.46% CAGR).
- •BGT pays the higher dividend yield (13.17% vs 4.08%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AM | BGT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 26.26 | N/A |
| Forward P/E | 20.22 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 7.98 | N/A |
| P/B ratio | 5.38 | 0.99 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.74 | N/A |
| FCF yield | 7.35% | N/A |
Profitability
| Metric | AM | BGT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 62.92% | 84.12% |
| Operating margin | 56.05% | 90.60% |
| Net margin | 30.45% | 73.11% |
| ROE | 20.55% | 7.53% |
| ROIC | 8.64% | N/A |
Dividends
| Metric | AM | BGT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.08% | 13.17% |
| Payout ratio | 107.14% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AM | BGT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.09% | 1.46% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 43.50% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 9.87% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 25.29% | 6.66% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, AM or BGT?
- Over the past five years, AM grew revenue faster — AM at a 6.09% CAGR versus BGT at 1.46%.
- Does AM or BGT pay a bigger dividend?
- AM yields 4.08% and BGT yields 13.17% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AM or BGT more profitable?
- BGT runs the higher net margin — AM at 30.45% versus BGT at 73.11%.
- How have AM and BGT total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, AM delivered 25.29% and BGT delivered 6.66% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Antero Midstream P/E ratioAntero Midstream dividend yieldBlackRock Floating Rate Income dividend yieldAntero Midstream ROEBlackRock Floating Rate Income ROEAntero Midstream operating marginBlackRock Floating Rate Income operating marginAntero Midstream revenue growthBlackRock Floating Rate Income revenue growthAntero Midstream free cash flow
Antero Midstream & BlackRock Floating Rate Income appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.