The Allstate Corporation (ALL) vs MetLife, Inc. (MET)
ALL leads on 13 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of The Allstate Corporation and MetLife, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ALL
The Allstate Corporation
$221.63Financial Services
MET
MetLife, Inc.
$88.84Financial Services
Total return — ALL vs MET
growth of $100 · last 26yALL +843.1%MET +576.1%ALL compounded faster
ALL MET
ALL vs MET: by the numbers
- •MET is the larger company ($57.16B vs $57.05B market cap).
- •ALL trades at the lower earnings multiple (4.89 vs 17.22 P/E).
- •ALL converts more revenue to profit (18.09% vs 4.70% net margin).
- •ALL grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.07% vs 3.40% CAGR).
- •MET pays the higher dividend yield (2.58% vs 1.88%).
Which is better, ALL or MET?
Metric tally: ALL 13 · MET 3It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueALL(lower P/E)
GrowthALL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMET(higher dividend yield)
QualityALL(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | ALL | MET |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 4.89● | 17.22 |
| Forward P/E | 7.46● | 8.96 |
| P/S ratio | 0.87 | 0.76● |
| P/B ratio | 1.84● | 2.13 |
| PEG ratio | 0.04 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 3.97● | 9.50 |
| FCF yield | 19.80% | 28.41%● |
Profitability
| Metric | ALL | MET |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 39.83%● | 28.40% |
| Operating margin | 23.30%● | 6.26% |
| Net margin | 18.09%● | 4.70% |
| ROE | 38.43%● | 13.24% |
| ROIC | 20.79%● | 0.72% |
Dividends
| Metric | ALL | MET |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | 2.58%● |
| Payout ratio | 10.75% | 47.81% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ALL | MET |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.07%● | 3.40% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 17.15%● | -3.45% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 15.76%● | 8.18% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 13.65%● | 10.03% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ALL or MET?
- It depends on your goal. value: ALL (lower P/E); growth: ALL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MET (higher dividend yield); quality: ALL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ALL leads 13 to 3.
- Is ALL or MET cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ALL is cheaper: ALL trades at a 4.89 P/E and MET at 17.22.
- Which has grown faster, ALL or MET?
- Over the past five years, ALL grew revenue faster — ALL at a 8.07% CAGR versus MET at 3.40%.
- Does ALL or MET pay a bigger dividend?
- ALL yields 1.88% and MET yields 2.58% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ALL or MET more profitable?
- ALL runs the higher net margin — ALL at 18.09% versus MET at 4.70%.
- Which has been the better investment, ALL or MET?
- Over the past 10-year, ALL delivered the higher annualized total return — ALL at 15.13% versus MET at 12.46%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Allstate P/E ratioMetLife P/E ratioAllstate dividend yieldMetLife dividend yieldAllstate ROEMetLife ROEAllstate operating marginMetLife operating marginAllstate revenue growthMetLife revenue growthAllstate free cash flowMetLife free cash flow
Allstate & MetLife appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.