Albemarle Corporation (ALB) vs RPM International Inc. (RPM)
RPM leads on 11 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Albemarle Corporation and RPM International Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 4, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
$135.56Basic Materials
RPM
RPM International Inc.
$111.62Basic Materials
Total return — ALB vs RPM
growth of $100 · last 30yALB +1307.7%RPM +793.0%ALB compounded faster
ALB RPM
ALB vs RPM: by the numbers
- •ALB is the larger company ($15.99B vs $14.25B market cap).
- •RPM is profitable (8.63% net margin) while ALB runs a net loss (-4.24%).
- •ALB grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.29% vs 5.79% CAGR).
- •RPM pays the higher dividend yield (1.94% vs 1.20%).
Which is better, ALB or RPM?
Metric tally: ALB 4 · RPM 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthALB(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeRPM(higher dividend yield)
QualityRPM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ALB | RPM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | — | 21.51 |
| Forward P/E | 10.96● | 20.30 |
| P/S ratio | 2.93 | 1.85● |
| P/B ratio | 1.63● | 4.53 |
| PEG ratio | — | 1.21 |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.58 | 14.86● |
| FCF yield | 3.59% | 4.04%● |
Profitability
| Metric | ALB | RPM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 18.53% | 41.36%● |
| Operating margin | 5.55% | 11.99%● |
| Net margin | -4.24% | 8.63%● |
| ROE | -2.36% | 21.16%● |
| ROIC | 0.64% | 12.50%● |
Dividends
| Metric | ALB | RPM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.20% | 1.94%● |
| Payout ratio | — | 40.15% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ALB | RPM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 11.29%● | 5.79% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 15.95% | 18.02%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 92.70%● | -3.15% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -3.35% | 6.28%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ALB or RPM?
- It depends on your goal. growth: ALB (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: RPM (higher dividend yield); quality: RPM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RPM leads 11 to 4.
- Which has grown faster, ALB or RPM?
- Over the past five years, ALB grew revenue faster — ALB at a 11.29% CAGR versus RPM at 5.79%.
- Does ALB or RPM pay a bigger dividend?
- ALB yields 1.20% and RPM yields 1.94% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ALB or RPM more profitable?
- RPM runs the higher net margin — ALB at -4.24% versus RPM at 8.63%.
- Which has been the better investment, ALB or RPM?
- Over the past 10-year, RPM delivered the higher annualized total return — ALB at 6.67% versus RPM at 10.49%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Albemarle P/E ratioRPM International P/E ratioAlbemarle dividend yieldRPM International dividend yieldAlbemarle ROERPM International ROEAlbemarle operating marginRPM International operating marginAlbemarle revenue growthRPM International revenue growthAlbemarle free cash flowRPM International free cash flow
Albemarle & RPM International appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 4, 2026.