Which has grown faster, ALB or MP?

Over the past five years, MP grew revenue faster — ALB at a 11.29% CAGR versus MP at 14.90%.

Does ALB or MP pay a bigger dividend?

ALB pays a dividend (1.25% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.

Which has been the better investment, ALB or MP?

Over the past 5-year, MP delivered the higher annualized total return — ALB at 5.88% versus MP at 7.62%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Albemarle Corporation (ALB) vs MP Materials Corp. (MP)

ALB leads on 8 of 10 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Albemarle Corporation and MP Materials Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

ALB

Albemarle Corporation

$15.15B

$128.42Basic Materials

MP Materials Corp.

$9.21B

$51.71Basic Materials

Total return — ALB vs MP

growth of $100 · last 6y

ALB +65.1%MP +430.0%MP compounded faster

ALB MP

ALB vs MP: by the numbers

•ALB is the larger company ($15.15B vs $9.21B market cap).
•Both run net losses; ALB's is the smaller (-4.24% vs -20.48% net margin).
•MP grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.90% vs 11.29% CAGR).
•ALB pays a dividend (1.25% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.

Which is better, ALB or MP?

Metric tally: ALB 8 · MP 2

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthMP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityALB(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ALB	MP
Forward P/E	10.32●	302.32
P/S ratio	2.79●	30.38
P/B ratio	1.56●	4.44
EV / EBITDA	16.81	—
FCF yield	3.76%	—

Profitability

Metric	ALB	MP
Gross margin	18.53%●	-2.40%
Operating margin	5.55%●	-39.42%
Net margin	-4.24%●	-20.48%
ROE	-2.36%●	-2.99%
ROIC	0.64%●	-2.36%

Dividends

Metric	ALB	MP
Dividend yield	1.25%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ALB	MP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	11.29%	14.90%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	15.95%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	92.70%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-3.94%	7.62%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, ALB or MP?: It depends on your goal. growth: MP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ALB (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ALB leads 8 to 2.
Which has grown faster, ALB or MP?: Over the past five years, MP grew revenue faster — ALB at a 11.29% CAGR versus MP at 14.90%.
Does ALB or MP pay a bigger dividend?: ALB pays a dividend (1.25% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.
Which has been the better investment, ALB or MP?: Over the past 5-year, MP delivered the higher annualized total return — ALB at 5.88% versus MP at 7.62%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ALB analysis Full MP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Albemarle P/E ratio MP Materials P/E ratio Albemarle dividend yield MP Materials dividend yield Albemarle ROE MP Materials ROE Albemarle operating margin MP Materials operating margin Albemarle revenue growth MP Materials revenue growth Albemarle free cash flow MP Materials free cash flow

Albemarle & MP Materials appear in these rankings

Dividend Aristocrats

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.