Albemarle Corporation (ALB) vs Masco Corporation (MAS)
A side-by-side comparison of Albemarle Corporation and Masco Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
$117.52Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
MAS
Masco Corporation
$68.55Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT
Total return — ALB vs MAS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yALB +68.4% (+5.3%/yr)MAS +140.5% (+9.2%/yr)MAS compounded faster over this window
ALB MAS
ALB vs MAS: by the numbers
- •ALB is the larger company ($13.86B vs $13.52B market cap).
- •MAS converts more revenue to profit (11.61% vs 3.79% net margin).
- •ALB grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.84% vs 1.02% CAGR).
- •MAS pays the higher dividend yield (1.88% vs 1.33%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ALB | MAS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | N/A | 15.76 |
| Forward P/E | 10.44 | 15.13 |
| P/S ratio | 2.35 | 1.77 |
| P/B ratio | 1.35 | N/A |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.49 | 10.98 |
| FCF yield | 9.69% | 10.75% |
Profitability
| Metric | ALB | MAS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 13.06% | 36.93% |
| Operating margin | 1.82% | 17.68% |
| Net margin | 3.79% | 11.61% |
| ROE | 2.18% | N/A |
| ROIC | 3.34% | 27.22% |
Dividends
| Metric | ALB | MAS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.33% | 1.88% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 29.20% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ALB | MAS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.84% | 1.02% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 5.07% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 55.34% | 13.25% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -11.68% | 4.52% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, ALB or MAS?
- Over the past five years, ALB grew revenue faster — ALB at a 12.84% CAGR versus MAS at 1.02%.
- Does ALB or MAS pay a bigger dividend?
- ALB yields 1.33% and MAS yields 1.88% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ALB or MAS more profitable?
- MAS runs the higher net margin — ALB at 3.79% versus MAS at 11.61%.
- How have ALB and MAS total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, ALB delivered 6.16% and MAS delivered 9.05% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Masco P/E ratioAlbemarle dividend yieldMasco dividend yieldAlbemarle ROEMasco ROEAlbemarle operating marginMasco operating marginAlbemarle revenue growthMasco revenue growthAlbemarle free cash flowMasco free cash flow
Albemarle & Masco appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.