Albemarle Corporation (ALB) vs Masco Corporation (MAS)
A side-by-side comparison of Albemarle Corporation and Masco Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 29, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
ALB
Albemarle Corporation
$112.95Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 12:25 PM EDT
MAS
Masco Corporation
$72.84Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 12:25 PM EDT
Total return — ALB vs MAS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yALB +2293.7%MAS +1117.8%ALB compounded faster
ALB MAS
ALB vs MAS: by the numbers
- •MAS is the larger company ($14.69B vs $13.32B market cap).
- •MAS is profitable (10.90% net margin) while ALB runs a net loss (-4.24%).
- •ALB grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.29% vs 0.27% CAGR).
- •MAS pays the higher dividend yield (1.54% vs 1.43%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ALB | MAS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | N/A | 20.25 |
| Forward P/E | 9.01 | 19.05 |
| P/S ratio | 2.44 | 2.16 |
| P/B ratio | 1.36 | N/A |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 5.61 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.81 | 13.52 |
| FCF yield | 4.30% | 5.69% |
Profitability
| Metric | ALB | MAS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 18.53% | 35.41% |
| Operating margin | 5.55% | 16.79% |
| Net margin | -4.24% | 10.90% |
| ROE | -2.36% | -435.48% |
| ROIC | 0.64% | 26.15% |
Dividends
| Metric | ALB | MAS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.43% | 1.54% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 32.47% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ALB | MAS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 11.29% | 0.27% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 5.07% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 92.70% | 2.44% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -9.19% | 8.47% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, ALB or MAS?
- Over the past five years, ALB grew revenue faster — ALB at a 11.29% CAGR versus MAS at 0.27%.
- Does ALB or MAS pay a bigger dividend?
- ALB yields 1.43% and MAS yields 1.54% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ALB or MAS more profitable?
- MAS runs the higher net margin — ALB at -4.24% versus MAS at 10.90%.
- How have ALB and MAS total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, ALB delivered 4.28% and MAS delivered 9.94% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Albemarle P/E ratioMasco P/E ratioAlbemarle dividend yieldMasco dividend yieldAlbemarle ROEMasco ROEAlbemarle operating marginMasco operating marginAlbemarle revenue growthMasco revenue growthAlbemarle free cash flowMasco free cash flow
Albemarle & Masco appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 29, 2026.