Is AKAM or ONTO cheaper?

On trailing earnings, AKAM is cheaper: AKAM trades at a 42.06 P/E and ONTO at 155.96.

Which has grown faster, AKAM or ONTO?

Over the past five years, ONTO grew revenue faster — AKAM at a 5.42% CAGR versus ONTO at 11.93%.

Is AKAM or ONTO more profitable?

ONTO runs the higher net margin — AKAM at 10.20% versus ONTO at 10.33%.

Which has been the better investment, AKAM or ONTO?

Over the past 10-year, ONTO delivered the higher annualized total return — AKAM at 8.91% versus ONTO at 33.40%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) vs Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO)

AKAM leads on 8 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Akamai Technologies, Inc. and Onto Innovation Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

AKAM

Akamai Technologies, Inc.

Total return — AKAM vs ONTO

growth of $100 · last 27y

AKAM -14.0%ONTO +2667.5%ONTO compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

AKAM ONTO

AKAM vs ONTO: by the numbers

•AKAM is the larger company ($18.16B vs $16.60B market cap).
•AKAM trades at the lower earnings multiple (42.06 vs 155.96 P/E).
•ONTO converts more revenue to profit (10.33% vs 10.20% net margin).
•ONTO grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.93% vs 5.42% CAGR).

Which is better, AKAM or ONTO?

Metric tally: AKAM 8 · ONTO 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueAKAM(lower P/E)

GrowthONTO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityONTO(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AKAM	ONTO
P/E ratio	42.06●	155.96
Forward P/E	17.50	—
P/S ratio	4.39●	16.19
P/B ratio	3.82●	7.83
PEG ratio	—	4.53
EV / EBITDA	18.10●	79.04
FCF yield	4.08%●	1.43%

Profitability

Metric	AKAM	ONTO
Gross margin	57.23%●	48.80%
Operating margin	13.67%●	10.53%
Net margin	10.20%	10.33%
ROE	8.87%●	4.99%
ROIC	4.35%	5.18%●

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AKAM	ONTO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.42%	11.93%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-1.94%	34.40%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	6.42%	11.03%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	1.73%	37.24%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, AKAM or ONTO?: It depends on your goal. value: AKAM (lower P/E); growth: ONTO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ONTO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AKAM leads 8 to 5.
Is AKAM or ONTO cheaper?: On trailing earnings, AKAM is cheaper: AKAM trades at a 42.06 P/E and ONTO at 155.96.
Which has grown faster, AKAM or ONTO?: Over the past five years, ONTO grew revenue faster — AKAM at a 5.42% CAGR versus ONTO at 11.93%.
Is AKAM or ONTO more profitable?: ONTO runs the higher net margin — AKAM at 10.20% versus ONTO at 10.33%.
Which has been the better investment, AKAM or ONTO?: Over the past 10-year, ONTO delivered the higher annualized total return — AKAM at 8.91% versus ONTO at 33.40%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AKAM analysis Full ONTO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Akamai Technologies P/E ratio Onto Innovation P/E ratio Akamai Technologies dividend yield Onto Innovation dividend yield Akamai Technologies ROE Onto Innovation ROE Akamai Technologies operating margin Onto Innovation operating margin Akamai Technologies revenue growth Onto Innovation revenue growth Akamai Technologies free cash flow Onto Innovation free cash flow

Akamai Technologies & Onto Innovation appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 20, 2026.