Which has the lower trailing P/E, AKAM or ONTO?

AKAM has the lower trailing P/E: AKAM trades at 38.18 and ONTO at 112.38. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, AKAM or ONTO?

Over the past five years, ONTO grew revenue faster — AKAM at a 5.33% CAGR versus ONTO at 11.67%.

Is AKAM or ONTO more profitable?

ONTO runs the higher net margin — AKAM at 9.51% versus ONTO at 11.84%.

How have AKAM and ONTO total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, AKAM delivered 7.36% and ONTO delivered 29.94% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) vs Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO)

A side-by-side comparison of Akamai Technologies, Inc. and Onto Innovation Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

AKAM

Akamai Technologies, Inc.

$15.43B

$106.13TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 29, 2026, 12:15 PM EDT

ONTO

Onto Innovation Inc.

$14.87B

$298.92TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 29, 2026, 12:15 PM EDT

Total return — AKAM vs ONTO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

AKAM +103.4% (+7.4%/yr)ONTO +1251.6% (+29.7%/yr)ONTO compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

AKAM ONTO

AKAM vs ONTO: by the numbers

•AKAM is the larger company ($15.43B vs $14.87B market cap).
•AKAM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (38.18 vs 112.38 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ONTO converts more revenue to profit (11.84% vs 9.51% net margin).
•ONTO grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.67% vs 5.33% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AKAM	ONTO
P/E ratio	38.18	112.38
Forward P/E	15.80	36.83
P/S ratio	3.57	13.27
P/B ratio	3.25	7.73
EV / EBITDA	18.77	61.22
FCF yield	4.08%	1.70%

Profitability

Metric	AKAM	ONTO
Gross margin	56.41%	50.36%
Operating margin	11.85%	12.48%
Net margin	9.51%	11.84%
ROE	8.65%	6.90%
ROIC	3.03%	3.42%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AKAM	ONTO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.33%	11.67%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-1.94%	-0.96%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	0.79%	15.11%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-0.94%	29.60%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, AKAM or ONTO?: AKAM has the lower trailing P/E: AKAM trades at 38.18 and ONTO at 112.38. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, AKAM or ONTO?: Over the past five years, ONTO grew revenue faster — AKAM at a 5.33% CAGR versus ONTO at 11.67%.
Is AKAM or ONTO more profitable?: ONTO runs the higher net margin — AKAM at 9.51% versus ONTO at 11.84%.
How have AKAM and ONTO total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, AKAM delivered 7.36% and ONTO delivered 29.94% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AKAM analysis Full ONTO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Akamai Technologies P/E ratio Onto Innovation P/E ratio Akamai Technologies ROE Onto Innovation ROE Akamai Technologies operating margin Onto Innovation operating margin Akamai Technologies revenue growth Onto Innovation revenue growth Akamai Technologies free cash flow Onto Innovation free cash flow

Akamai Technologies & Onto Innovation appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.