Which has the lower trailing P/E, AKAM or LDOS?

LDOS has the lower trailing P/E: AKAM trades at 38.54 and LDOS at 12.08. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, AKAM or LDOS?

Over the past five years, LDOS grew revenue faster — AKAM at a 5.33% CAGR versus LDOS at 5.87%.

Does AKAM or LDOS pay a bigger dividend?

LDOS pays a dividend (1.30% yield), while AKAM has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is AKAM or LDOS more profitable?

AKAM runs the higher net margin — AKAM at 9.51% versus LDOS at 7.86%.

How have AKAM and LDOS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, AKAM delivered 7.39% and LDOS delivered 13.85% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) vs Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS)

A side-by-side comparison of Akamai Technologies, Inc. and Leidos Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

AKAM

Akamai Technologies, Inc.

$15.58B

$107.13TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 10, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

LDOS

Leidos Holdings, Inc.

$16.30B

$129.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 10, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — AKAM vs LDOS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

AKAM +104.1% (+7.4%/yr)LDOS +267.4% (+13.9%/yr)LDOS compounded faster over this window

AKAM LDOS

AKAM vs LDOS: by the numbers

•LDOS is the larger company ($16.30B vs $15.58B market cap).
•LDOS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.08 vs 38.54 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•AKAM converts more revenue to profit (9.51% vs 7.86% net margin).
•LDOS grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.87% vs 5.33% CAGR).
•LDOS pays a dividend (1.30% yield), while AKAM has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AKAM	LDOS
P/E ratio	38.54	12.08
Forward P/E	15.95	10.46
P/S ratio	3.60	0.92
P/B ratio	3.28	3.08
EV / EBITDA	18.89	9.48
FCF yield	4.04%	13.27%

Profitability

Metric	AKAM	LDOS
Gross margin	56.41%	17.42%
Operating margin	11.85%	11.46%
Net margin	9.51%	7.86%
ROE	8.65%	26.23%
ROIC	3.03%	14.42%

Dividends

Metric	AKAM	LDOS
Dividend yield	N/A	1.30%
Payout ratio	N/A	15.76%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AKAM	LDOS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.33%	5.87%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-1.94%	20.47%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	0.79%	26.94%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-0.87%	7.29%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, AKAM or LDOS?: LDOS has the lower trailing P/E: AKAM trades at 38.54 and LDOS at 12.08. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, AKAM or LDOS?: Over the past five years, LDOS grew revenue faster — AKAM at a 5.33% CAGR versus LDOS at 5.87%.
Does AKAM or LDOS pay a bigger dividend?: LDOS pays a dividend (1.30% yield), while AKAM has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is AKAM or LDOS more profitable?: AKAM runs the higher net margin — AKAM at 9.51% versus LDOS at 7.86%.
How have AKAM and LDOS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, AKAM delivered 7.39% and LDOS delivered 13.85% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AKAM analysis Full LDOS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Akamai Technologies P/E ratio Leidos P/E ratio Leidos dividend yield Akamai Technologies ROE Leidos ROE Akamai Technologies operating margin Leidos operating margin Akamai Technologies revenue growth Leidos revenue growth Akamai Technologies free cash flow Leidos free cash flow

Akamai Technologies & Leidos appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.