Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) vs Fortive Corporation (FTV)
FTV leads on 9 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Akamai Technologies, Inc. and Fortive Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 18, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AKAM
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
$120.19TechnologyAt close: Jul 17, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
FTV
Fortive Corporation
$61.78TechnologyAt close: Jul 17, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — AKAM vs FTV
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yAKAM +114.9%FTV +110.1%AKAM compounded faster
AKAM FTV
AKAM vs FTV: by the numbers
- •FTV is the larger company ($18.83B vs $17.47B market cap).
- •FTV trades at the lower earnings multiple (36.77 vs 40.47 P/E).
- •FTV converts more revenue to profit (11.48% vs 10.20% net margin).
- •AKAM grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.42% vs 2.10% CAGR).
- •FTV pays a dividend (0.39% yield) while AKAM does not currently pay one.
Which is better, AKAM or FTV?
Metric tally: AKAM 4 · FTV 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueFTV(lower P/E)
GrowthAKAM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityFTV(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AKAM | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.47 | 36.77● |
| Forward P/E | 17.96● | 20.64 |
| P/S ratio | 4.23 | 4.08● |
| P/B ratio | 3.67 | 3.18● |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.88 | 17.88 |
| FCF yield | 4.24% | 5.03%● |
Profitability
| Metric | AKAM | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 57.23% | 61.83%● |
| Operating margin | 13.67% | 17.73%● |
| Net margin | 10.20% | 11.48%● |
| ROE | 8.87% | 8.94% |
| ROIC | 4.35% | 7.44%● |
Dividends
| Metric | AKAM | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 0.39% |
| Payout ratio | — | 13.71% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AKAM | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.42%● | 2.10% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -1.94%● | -17.51% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 6.42%● | -7.26% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 0.53% | 3.67%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AKAM or FTV?
- It depends on your goal. value: FTV (lower P/E); growth: AKAM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: FTV (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FTV leads 9 to 4.
- Is AKAM or FTV cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, FTV is cheaper: AKAM trades at a 40.47 P/E and FTV at 36.77.
- Which has grown faster, AKAM or FTV?
- Over the past five years, AKAM grew revenue faster — AKAM at a 5.42% CAGR versus FTV at 2.10%.
- Does AKAM or FTV pay a bigger dividend?
- FTV pays a dividend (0.39% yield) while AKAM does not currently pay one.
- Is AKAM or FTV more profitable?
- FTV runs the higher net margin — AKAM at 10.20% versus FTV at 11.48%.
- Which has been the better investment, AKAM or FTV?
- Over the past 10-year, AKAM delivered the higher annualized total return — AKAM at 7.70% versus FTV at 7.14%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Akamai Technologies P/E ratioFortive P/E ratioAkamai Technologies dividend yieldFortive dividend yieldAkamai Technologies ROEFortive ROEAkamai Technologies operating marginFortive operating marginAkamai Technologies revenue growthFortive revenue growthAkamai Technologies free cash flowFortive free cash flow
Akamai Technologies & Fortive appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 18, 2026.