Akamai Technologies, Inc. (AKAM) vs Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS)
FIS leads on 10 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Akamai Technologies, Inc. and Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AKAM
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
$133.50Technology
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
$39.20Technology
Not enough overlapping price history to compare AKAM and FIS.
AKAM vs FIS: by the numbers
- •FIS is the larger company ($20.26B vs $19.41B market cap).
- •FIS trades at the lower earnings multiple (7.57 vs 44.95 P/E).
- •FIS converts more revenue to profit (22.91% vs 10.20% net margin).
- •AKAM grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.42% vs -1.69% CAGR).
- •FIS pays a dividend (4.29% yield) while AKAM does not currently pay one.
Which is better, AKAM or FIS?
Metric tally: AKAM 5 · FIS 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueFIS(lower P/E)
GrowthAKAM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityAKAM(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | AKAM | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 44.95 | 7.57● |
| Forward P/E | 18.70 | 6.24● |
| P/S ratio | 4.69 | 1.74● |
| P/B ratio | 4.08 | 1.27● |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.32 |
| EV / EBITDA | 22.14 | 4.15● |
| FCF yield | 3.82% | 13.72%● |
Profitability
| Metric | AKAM | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 57.23%● | 37.59% |
| Operating margin | 13.67% | 17.90%● |
| Net margin | 10.20% | 22.91%● |
| ROE | 8.87% | 16.72%● |
| ROIC | 4.35%● | 3.49% |
Dividends
| Metric | AKAM | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 4.29% |
| Payout ratio | — | 227.03% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AKAM | FIS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.42%● | -1.69% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -1.94% | 23.73%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 6.42%● | -5.92% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 2.42%● | -21.11% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AKAM or FIS?
- It depends on your goal. value: FIS (lower P/E); growth: AKAM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: AKAM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FIS leads 10 to 5.
- Is AKAM or FIS cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, FIS is cheaper: AKAM trades at a 44.95 P/E and FIS at 7.57.
- Which has grown faster, AKAM or FIS?
- Over the past five years, AKAM grew revenue faster — AKAM at a 5.42% CAGR versus FIS at -1.69%.
- Does AKAM or FIS pay a bigger dividend?
- FIS pays a dividend (4.29% yield) while AKAM does not currently pay one.
- Is AKAM or FIS more profitable?
- FIS runs the higher net margin — AKAM at 10.20% versus FIS at 22.91%.
- Which has been the better investment, AKAM or FIS?
- Over the past 10-year, AKAM delivered the higher annualized total return — AKAM at 9.73% versus FIS at -4.41%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Akamai Technologies P/E ratioFidelity National Information Services P/E ratioAkamai Technologies dividend yieldFidelity National Information Services dividend yieldAkamai Technologies ROEFidelity National Information Services ROEAkamai Technologies operating marginFidelity National Information Services operating marginAkamai Technologies revenue growthFidelity National Information Services revenue growthAkamai Technologies free cash flowFidelity National Information Services free cash flow
Akamai Technologies & Fidelity National Information Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.