Which has the lower trailing P/E, AIT or DRS?

AIT has the lower trailing P/E: AIT trades at 29.43 and DRS at 32.12. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, AIT or DRS?

Over the past five years, AIT grew revenue faster — AIT at a 8.95% CAGR versus DRS at 5.56%.

Does AIT or DRS pay a bigger dividend?

AIT yields 0.62% and DRS yields 1.17% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is AIT or DRS more profitable?

DRS runs the higher net margin — AIT at 8.35% versus DRS at 8.52%.

How have AIT and DRS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, AIT delivered 22.83% and DRS delivered 42.41% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. (AIT) vs Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS)

A side-by-side comparison of Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. and Leonardo DRS, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

AIT

Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc.

$11.91B

$322.22IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

DRS

Leonardo DRS, Inc.

$10.29B

$38.54IndustrialsAt close: Aug 28, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — AIT vs DRS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

AIT +666.7% (+22.6%/yr)DRS +3335.1% (+42.4%/yr)DRS compounded faster over this window

AIT DRS

AIT vs DRS: by the numbers

•AIT is the larger company ($11.91B vs $10.29B market cap).
•AIT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (29.43 vs 32.12 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•DRS converts more revenue to profit (8.52% vs 8.35% net margin).
•AIT grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.95% vs 5.56% CAGR).
•DRS pays the higher dividend yield (1.17% vs 0.62%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AIT	DRS
P/E ratio	29.43	32.12
Forward P/E	30.09	27.92
P/S ratio	2.46	2.74
P/B ratio	6.55	3.70
EV / EBITDA	20.94	21.81
FCF yield	3.76%	3.50%

Profitability

Metric	AIT	DRS
Gross margin	30.34%	24.87%
Operating margin	11.06%	10.53%
Net margin	8.35%	8.52%
ROE	22.27%	11.49%
ROIC	17.08%	10.51%

Dividends

Metric	AIT	DRS
Dividend yield	0.62%	1.17%
Payout ratio	17.94%	42.86%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AIT	DRS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.95%	5.56%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.35%	13.00%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	15.24%	26.07%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	29.78%	28.18%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, AIT or DRS?: AIT has the lower trailing P/E: AIT trades at 29.43 and DRS at 32.12. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, AIT or DRS?: Over the past five years, AIT grew revenue faster — AIT at a 8.95% CAGR versus DRS at 5.56%.
Does AIT or DRS pay a bigger dividend?: AIT yields 0.62% and DRS yields 1.17% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is AIT or DRS more profitable?: DRS runs the higher net margin — AIT at 8.35% versus DRS at 8.52%.
How have AIT and DRS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, AIT delivered 22.83% and DRS delivered 42.41% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AIT analysis Full DRS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Applied Industrial Technologies P/E ratio Leonardo DRS P/E ratio Applied Industrial Technologies dividend yield Leonardo DRS dividend yield Applied Industrial Technologies ROE Leonardo DRS ROE Applied Industrial Technologies operating margin Leonardo DRS operating margin Applied Industrial Technologies revenue growth Leonardo DRS revenue growth Applied Industrial Technologies free cash flow Leonardo DRS free cash flow

Applied Industrial Technologies & Leonardo DRS appear in these rankings

Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 28, 2026.