AGNT, Inc. (AGNT) vs Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD)

A side-by-side comparison of AGNT, Inc. and Gladstone Commercial Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — AGNT vs GOOD

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 9y
AGNT -27.9% (-3.6%/yr)GOOD +38.0% (+3.6%/yr)GOOD compounded faster over this window
05001kStart $1002020202220242026$72$138
AGNT GOOD

AGNT vs GOOD: by the numbers

  • •AGNT is the larger company ($645M vs $617M market cap).
  • •GOOD is profitable (14.55% net margin) while AGNT runs a net loss (-0.35%).
  • •AGNT grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.48% vs 4.89% CAGR).
  • •GOOD pays the higher dividend yield (9.38% vs 5.17%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricAGNTGOOD
P/E ratioN/A24.03
Forward P/E26.1751.02
PEG ratioN/A0.68
P/S ratio0.133.63
P/B ratio2.303.92
EV / EBITDAN/A11.54
FCF yield14.33%8.78%

For REITs like Gladstone Commercial Corporation, GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.

Profitability

MetricAGNTGOOD
Gross margin6.83%5.94%
Operating margin-0.23%39.09%
Net margin-0.35%14.55%
ROE-6.12%15.74%
ROIC-4.10%5.40%

Dividends

MetricAGNTGOOD
Dividend yield5.17%9.38%
Payout ratioN/A226.07%

Gladstone Commercial Corporation's payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.

Growth (annualized)

MetricAGNTGOOD
Revenue CAGR (5Y)12.48%4.89%
EPS CAGR (5Y)N/A35.43%
FCF CAGR (5Y)-16.76%2.58%
Total return CAGR (5Y)-36.01%-1.64%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, AGNT or GOOD?
Over the past five years, AGNT grew revenue faster — AGNT at a 12.48% CAGR versus GOOD at 4.89%.
Does AGNT or GOOD pay a bigger dividend?
AGNT yields 5.17% and GOOD yields 9.38% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is AGNT or GOOD more profitable?
GOOD runs the higher net margin — AGNT at -0.35% versus GOOD at 14.55%.
How have AGNT and GOOD total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, AGNT delivered -36.01% and GOOD delivered -1.64% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.