Which has grown faster, AG or MP?

Over the past five years, AG grew revenue faster — AG at a 31.59% CAGR versus MP at 14.90%.

Does AG or MP pay a bigger dividend?

AG pays a dividend (0.40% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.

Is AG or MP more profitable?

AG runs the higher net margin — AG at 19.72% versus MP at -20.48%.

Which has been the better investment, AG or MP?

Over the past 5-year, MP delivered the higher annualized total return — AG at 2.74% versus MP at 9.17%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) vs MP Materials Corp. (MP)

AG leads on 9 of 10 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of First Majestic Silver Corp. and MP Materials Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 28, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

First Majestic Silver Corp.

$8.34B

$16.89Basic Materials

MP Materials Corp.

$9.60B

$53.90Basic Materials

Total return — AG vs MP

growth of $100 · last 6y

AG +85.2%MP +439.0%MP compounded faster

AG MP

AG vs MP: by the numbers

•MP is the larger company ($9.60B vs $8.34B market cap).
•AG is profitable (19.72% net margin) while MP runs a net loss (-20.48%).
•AG grew revenue faster over the past five years (31.59% vs 14.90% CAGR).
•AG pays a dividend (0.40% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.

Which is better, AG or MP?

Metric tally: AG 9 · MP 1

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthAG(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityAG(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AG	MP
P/E ratio	28.92	—
Forward P/E	16.02●	53.79
P/S ratio	5.68●	30.90
P/B ratio	2.92●	4.51
PEG ratio	1.11	—
EV / EBITDA	9.41	—
FCF yield	6.39%	—

Profitability

Metric	AG	MP
Gross margin	34.81%●	-2.40%
Operating margin	27.84%●	-39.42%
Net margin	19.72%●	-20.48%
ROE	10.13%●	-2.99%
ROIC	4.49%●	-2.36%

Dividends

Metric	AG	MP
Dividend yield	0.40%	—
Payout ratio	19.54%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AG	MP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	31.59%●	14.90%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	26.05%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	67.71%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	1.68%	9.17%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, AG or MP?: It depends on your goal. growth: AG (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: AG (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AG leads 9 to 1.
Which has grown faster, AG or MP?: Over the past five years, AG grew revenue faster — AG at a 31.59% CAGR versus MP at 14.90%.
Does AG or MP pay a bigger dividend?: AG pays a dividend (0.40% yield) while MP does not currently pay one.
Is AG or MP more profitable?: AG runs the higher net margin — AG at 19.72% versus MP at -20.48%.
Which has been the better investment, AG or MP?: Over the past 5-year, MP delivered the higher annualized total return — AG at 2.74% versus MP at 9.17%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AG analysis Full MP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

First Majestic Silver P/E ratio MP Materials P/E ratio First Majestic Silver dividend yield MP Materials dividend yield First Majestic Silver ROE MP Materials ROE First Majestic Silver operating margin MP Materials operating margin First Majestic Silver revenue growth MP Materials revenue growth First Majestic Silver free cash flow MP Materials free cash flow

First Majestic Silver & MP Materials appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 28, 2026.