Aflac Incorporated (AFL) vs Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ)
AFL leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Aflac Incorporated and Nasdaq, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 19, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AFL
Aflac Incorporated
$115.47Financial Services
NDAQ
Nasdaq, Inc.
$83.29Financial Services
Total return — AFL vs NDAQ
growth of $100 · last 24yAFL +621.7%NDAQ +1533.5%NDAQ compounded faster
AFL NDAQ
AFL vs NDAQ: by the numbers
- •AFL is the larger company ($58.77B vs $46.28B market cap).
- •AFL trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.18 vs 25.09 P/E).
- •AFL converts more revenue to profit (25.44% vs 23.15% net margin).
- •NDAQ grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.89% vs -4.37% CAGR).
- •AFL pays the higher dividend yield (2.06% vs 1.34%).
Which is better, AFL or NDAQ?
Metric tally: AFL 8 · NDAQ 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueAFL(lower P/E)
GrowthNDAQ(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeAFL(higher dividend yield)
QualityNDAQ(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AFL | NDAQ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.18● | 25.09 |
| Forward P/E | 16.35● | 18.72 |
| P/S ratio | 3.26● | 5.76 |
| P/B ratio | 1.98● | 3.96 |
| PEG ratio | 26.36 | 0.51● |
Profitability
| Metric | AFL | NDAQ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 47.76% | 54.81%● |
| Operating margin | 30.97%● | 29.53% |
| Net margin | 25.44%● | 23.15% |
| ROE | 15.47% | 15.90%● |
| ROIC | 3.37% | 8.26%● |
Dividends
| Metric | AFL | NDAQ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.06%● | 1.34% |
| Payout ratio | 34.69% | 35.78% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AFL | NDAQ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -4.37% | 6.89%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.50% | 10.62%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 19.96%● | 8.33% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AFL or NDAQ?
- It depends on your goal. value: AFL (lower P/E); growth: NDAQ (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: AFL (higher dividend yield); quality: NDAQ (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AFL leads 8 to 6.
- Is AFL or NDAQ cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, AFL is cheaper: AFL trades at a 13.18 P/E and NDAQ at 25.09.
- Which has grown faster, AFL or NDAQ?
- Over the past five years, NDAQ grew revenue faster — AFL at a -4.37% CAGR versus NDAQ at 6.89%.
- Does AFL or NDAQ pay a bigger dividend?
- AFL yields 2.06% and NDAQ yields 1.34% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AFL or NDAQ more profitable?
- AFL runs the higher net margin — AFL at 25.44% versus NDAQ at 23.15%.
- Which has been the better investment, AFL or NDAQ?
- Over the past 10-year, NDAQ delivered the higher annualized total return — AFL at 15.52% versus NDAQ at 16.23%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Aflac P/E ratioNasdaq P/E ratioAflac dividend yieldNasdaq dividend yieldAflac ROENasdaq ROEAflac operating marginNasdaq operating marginAflac revenue growthNasdaq revenue growthAflac free cash flowNasdaq free cash flow
Aflac & Nasdaq appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 19, 2026.