Is AFL or MET cheaper?

On trailing earnings, AFL is cheaper: AFL trades at a 13.45 P/E and MET at 17.22.

Which has grown faster, AFL or MET?

Over the past five years, MET grew revenue faster — AFL at a -4.37% CAGR versus MET at 3.40%.

Does AFL or MET pay a bigger dividend?

AFL yields 2.02% and MET yields 2.58% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is AFL or MET more profitable?

AFL runs the higher net margin — AFL at 25.44% versus MET at 4.70%.

Which has been the better investment, AFL or MET?

Over the past 10-year, AFL delivered the higher annualized total return — AFL at 15.72% versus MET at 12.46%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Aflac Incorporated (AFL) vs MetLife, Inc. (MET)

AFL leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Aflac Incorporated and MetLife, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

AFL

Aflac Incorporated

$59.96B

$117.80Financial Services

MET

MetLife, Inc.

$57.16B

$88.84Financial Services

Total return — AFL vs MET

growth of $100 · last 26y

AFL +926.1%MET +576.1%AFL compounded faster

AFL MET

AFL vs MET: by the numbers

•AFL is the larger company ($59.96B vs $57.16B market cap).
•AFL trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.45 vs 17.22 P/E).
•AFL converts more revenue to profit (25.44% vs 4.70% net margin).
•MET grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.40% vs -4.37% CAGR).
•MET pays the higher dividend yield (2.58% vs 2.02%).

Which is better, AFL or MET?

Metric tally: AFL 8 · MET 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueAFL(lower P/E)

GrowthMET(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeMET(higher dividend yield)

QualityAFL(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	AFL	MET
P/E ratio	13.45●	17.22
Forward P/E	16.68	8.96●
P/S ratio	3.33	0.76●
P/B ratio	2.70	2.13●
PEG ratio	26.89	—
EV / EBITDA	9.48	9.50
FCF yield	4.84%	28.41%●

Profitability

Metric	AFL	MET
Gross margin	47.76%●	28.40%
Operating margin	30.97%●	6.26%
Net margin	25.44%●	4.70%
ROE	20.66%●	13.24%
ROIC	3.21%●	0.72%

Dividends

Metric	AFL	MET
Dividend yield	2.02%	2.58%●
Payout ratio	34.69%	47.81%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AFL	MET
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-4.37%	3.40%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	0.50%●	-3.45%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-13.07%	8.18%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	18.59%●	10.03%

Frequently asked

Which is better, AFL or MET?: It depends on your goal. value: AFL (lower P/E); growth: MET (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MET (higher dividend yield); quality: AFL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AFL leads 8 to 7.
Is AFL or MET cheaper?: On trailing earnings, AFL is cheaper: AFL trades at a 13.45 P/E and MET at 17.22.
Which has grown faster, AFL or MET?: Over the past five years, MET grew revenue faster — AFL at a -4.37% CAGR versus MET at 3.40%.
Does AFL or MET pay a bigger dividend?: AFL yields 2.02% and MET yields 2.58% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is AFL or MET more profitable?: AFL runs the higher net margin — AFL at 25.44% versus MET at 4.70%.
Which has been the better investment, AFL or MET?: Over the past 10-year, AFL delivered the higher annualized total return — AFL at 15.72% versus MET at 12.46%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AFL analysis Full MET analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Aflac P/E ratio MetLife P/E ratio Aflac dividend yield MetLife dividend yield Aflac ROE MetLife ROE Aflac operating margin MetLife operating margin Aflac revenue growth MetLife revenue growth Aflac free cash flow MetLife free cash flow

Aflac & MetLife appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Dividend Aristocrats Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.