Which has the lower trailing P/E, AFL or MET?

AFL has the lower trailing P/E: AFL trades at 14.45 and MET at 18.45. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, AFL or MET?

Over the past five years, MET grew revenue faster — AFL at a -4.37% CAGR versus MET at 3.40%.

Does AFL or MET pay a bigger dividend?

AFL yields 1.88% and MET yields 2.41% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is AFL or MET more profitable?

AFL runs the higher net margin — AFL at 25.44% versus MET at 4.70%.

How have AFL and MET total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, AFL delivered 16.05% and MET delivered 13.39% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Aflac Incorporated (AFL) vs MetLife, Inc. (MET)

A side-by-side comparison of Aflac Incorporated and MetLife, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

AFL

Aflac Incorporated

$65.94B

$129.55Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MET

MetLife, Inc.

$62.73B

$97.49Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — AFL vs MET

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 26y

AFL +1811.4%MET +1252.4%AFL compounded faster

AFL MET

AFL vs MET: by the numbers

•AFL is the larger company ($65.94B vs $62.73B market cap).
•AFL trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.45 vs 18.45 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•AFL converts more revenue to profit (25.44% vs 4.70% net margin).
•MET grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.40% vs -4.37% CAGR).
•MET pays the higher dividend yield (2.41% vs 1.88%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AFL	MET
P/E ratio	14.45	18.45
Forward P/E	18.03	9.66
P/S ratio	3.58	0.81
P/B ratio	2.17	2.28
PEG ratio	28.89	N/A

Profitability

Metric	AFL	MET
Gross margin	38.93%	28.40%
Operating margin	30.97%	6.26%
Net margin	25.44%	4.70%
ROE	15.47%	13.24%
ROIC	3.37%	0.72%

Dividends

Metric	AFL	MET
Dividend yield	1.88%	2.41%
Payout ratio	34.69%	47.81%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AFL	MET
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-4.37%	3.40%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	0.50%	-3.45%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	21.80%	14.26%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, AFL or MET?: AFL has the lower trailing P/E: AFL trades at 14.45 and MET at 18.45. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, AFL or MET?: Over the past five years, MET grew revenue faster — AFL at a -4.37% CAGR versus MET at 3.40%.
Does AFL or MET pay a bigger dividend?: AFL yields 1.88% and MET yields 2.41% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is AFL or MET more profitable?: AFL runs the higher net margin — AFL at 25.44% versus MET at 4.70%.
How have AFL and MET total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, AFL delivered 16.05% and MET delivered 13.39% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AFL analysis Full MET analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Aflac P/E ratio MetLife P/E ratio Aflac dividend yield MetLife dividend yield Aflac ROE MetLife ROE Aflac operating margin MetLife operating margin Aflac revenue growth MetLife revenue growth Aflac free cash flow MetLife free cash flow

Aflac & MetLife appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks 25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.