Which has the lower trailing P/E, AFL or MET?

AFL has the lower trailing P/E: AFL trades at 12.42 and MET at 18.64. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, AFL or MET?

Over the past five years, MET grew revenue faster — AFL at a -4.64% CAGR versus MET at 2.19%.

Does AFL or MET pay a bigger dividend?

AFL yields 2.11% and MET yields 2.40% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is AFL or MET more profitable?

AFL runs the higher net margin — AFL at 26.88% versus MET at 4.61%.

How have AFL and MET total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, AFL delivered 14.83% and MET delivered 13.17% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Aflac Incorporated (AFL) vs MetLife, Inc. (MET)

A side-by-side comparison of Aflac Incorporated and MetLife, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

AFL

Aflac Incorporated

$58.68B

$115.28Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MET

MetLife, Inc.

$62.50B

$97.14Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — AFL vs MET

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

AFL +292.5% (+14.7%/yr)MET +240.1% (+13.0%/yr)AFL compounded faster over this window

AFL MET

AFL vs MET: by the numbers

•MET is the larger company ($62.50B vs $58.68B market cap).
•AFL trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.42 vs 18.64 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•AFL converts more revenue to profit (26.88% vs 4.61% net margin).
•MET grew revenue faster over the past five years (2.19% vs -4.64% CAGR).
•MET pays the higher dividend yield (2.40% vs 2.11%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AFL	MET
P/E ratio	12.42	18.64
Forward P/E	16.44	9.69
P/S ratio	3.24	0.79
P/B ratio	1.94	2.29

Profitability

Metric	AFL	MET
Gross margin	38.93%	36.36%
Operating margin	32.16%	6.19%
Net margin	26.88%	4.61%
ROE	16.04%	13.27%

Dividends

Metric	AFL	MET
Dividend yield	2.11%	2.40%
Payout ratio	25.97%	44.53%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AFL	MET
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-4.64%	2.19%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	0.50%	-3.45%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	18.59%	13.10%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, AFL or MET?: AFL has the lower trailing P/E: AFL trades at 12.42 and MET at 18.64. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, AFL or MET?: Over the past five years, MET grew revenue faster — AFL at a -4.64% CAGR versus MET at 2.19%.
Does AFL or MET pay a bigger dividend?: AFL yields 2.11% and MET yields 2.40% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is AFL or MET more profitable?: AFL runs the higher net margin — AFL at 26.88% versus MET at 4.61%.
How have AFL and MET total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, AFL delivered 14.83% and MET delivered 13.17% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AFL analysis Full MET analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Aflac P/E ratio MetLife P/E ratio Aflac dividend yield MetLife dividend yield Aflac ROE MetLife ROE Aflac operating margin MetLife operating margin Aflac revenue growth MetLife revenue growth

Aflac & MetLife appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks 25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.