Aflac Incorporated (AFL) vs Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO)
APO leads on 8 of 13 compared metrics, though AFL is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Aflac Incorporated and Apollo Global Management, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AFL
Aflac Incorporated
$117.80Financial Services
APO
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
$133.88Financial Services
Total return — AFL vs APO
growth of $100 · last 15yAFL +347.0%APO +657.4%APO compounded faster
AFL APO
AFL vs APO: by the numbers
- •APO is the larger company ($79.41B vs $59.74B market cap).
- •AFL trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.45 vs 40.08 P/E).
- •AFL converts more revenue to profit (25.44% vs 7.24% net margin).
- •APO grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.15% vs -4.37% CAGR).
- •AFL pays the higher dividend yield (2.02% vs 1.56%).
Which is better, AFL or APO?
Metric tally: AFL 5 · APO 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueAFL(lower P/E)
GrowthAPO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeAFL(higher dividend yield)
QualityAPO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AFL | APO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.45● | 40.08 |
| Forward P/E | 16.68 | 14.99● |
| P/S ratio | 3.33 | 2.68● |
| P/B ratio | 2.70● | 3.99 |
| PEG ratio | 26.89 | 0.53● |
Profitability
| Metric | AFL | APO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 47.76% | 89.33%● |
| Operating margin | 30.97% | 31.05% |
| Net margin | 25.44%● | 7.24% |
| ROE | 20.66%● | 10.78% |
| ROIC | 3.21% | 7.24%● |
Dividends
| Metric | AFL | APO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.02%● | 1.56% |
| Payout ratio | 34.69% | 28.63% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AFL | APO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -4.37% | 37.15%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.50% | 75.44%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 18.88% | 21.35%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AFL or APO?
- It depends on your goal. value: AFL (lower P/E); growth: APO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: AFL (higher dividend yield); quality: APO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, APO leads 8 to 5.
- Is AFL or APO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, AFL is cheaper: AFL trades at a 13.45 P/E and APO at 40.08.
- Which has grown faster, AFL or APO?
- Over the past five years, APO grew revenue faster — AFL at a -4.37% CAGR versus APO at 37.15%.
- Does AFL or APO pay a bigger dividend?
- AFL yields 2.02% and APO yields 1.56% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AFL or APO more profitable?
- AFL runs the higher net margin — AFL at 25.44% versus APO at 7.24%.
- Which has been the better investment, AFL or APO?
- Over the past 10-year, APO delivered the higher annualized total return — AFL at 15.82% versus APO at 29.59%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Aflac P/E ratioApollo Global Management P/E ratioAflac dividend yieldApollo Global Management dividend yieldAflac ROEApollo Global Management ROEAflac operating marginApollo Global Management operating marginAflac revenue growthApollo Global Management revenue growthAflac free cash flowApollo Global Management free cash flow
Aflac & Apollo Global Management appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.