Which has grown faster, AFCG or ZSTK?

Over the past five years, ZSTK grew revenue faster — AFCG at a 22.23% CAGR versus ZSTK at 78.28%.

Does AFCG or ZSTK pay a bigger dividend?

AFCG pays a dividend (7.53% yield), while ZSTK has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is AFCG or ZSTK more profitable?

AFCG runs the higher net margin — AFCG at 21.44% versus ZSTK at -444.23%.

How have AFCG and ZSTK total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, AFCG delivered -16.14% and ZSTK delivered -74.10% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Advanced Flower Capital Inc. (AFCG) vs ZeroStack Corp. (ZSTK)

A side-by-side comparison of Advanced Flower Capital Inc. and ZeroStack Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

AFCG

Advanced Flower Capital Inc.

$75M

$3.28Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

ZSTK

ZeroStack Corp.

$83M

$4.75Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — AFCG vs ZSTK

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y

AFCG -57.9% (-15.9%/yr)ZSTK -99.9% (-73.6%/yr)AFCG compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

AFCG ZSTK

AFCG vs ZSTK: by the numbers

•ZSTK is the larger company ($83M vs $75M market cap).
•AFCG is profitable (21.44% net margin) while ZSTK runs a net loss (-444.23%).
•ZSTK grew revenue faster over the past five years (78.28% vs 22.23% CAGR).
•AFCG pays a dividend (7.53% yield), while ZSTK has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AFCG	ZSTK
P/E ratio	17.26	N/A
Forward P/E	4.66	N/A
P/S ratio	3.08	2.08
P/B ratio	0.40	6.01
EV / EBITDA	8.07	N/A
FCF yield	16.66%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	AFCG	ZSTK
Gross margin	83.05%	-9.78%
Operating margin	-43.59%	-27.47%
Net margin	21.44%	-444.23%
ROE	2.78%	-1287.00%
ROIC	3.65%	N/A

Dividends

Metric	AFCG	ZSTK
Dividend yield	7.53%	N/A
Payout ratio	131.58%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AFCG	ZSTK
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.23%	78.28%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	49.22%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-16.14%	-74.10%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, AFCG or ZSTK?: Over the past five years, ZSTK grew revenue faster — AFCG at a 22.23% CAGR versus ZSTK at 78.28%.
Does AFCG or ZSTK pay a bigger dividend?: AFCG pays a dividend (7.53% yield), while ZSTK has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is AFCG or ZSTK more profitable?: AFCG runs the higher net margin — AFCG at 21.44% versus ZSTK at -444.23%.
How have AFCG and ZSTK total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, AFCG delivered -16.14% and ZSTK delivered -74.10% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AFCG analysis Full ZSTK analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Advanced Flower Capital P/E ratio Advanced Flower Capital dividend yield Advanced Flower Capital ROE ZeroStack ROE Advanced Flower Capital operating margin ZeroStack operating margin Advanced Flower Capital revenue growth ZeroStack revenue growth Advanced Flower Capital free cash flow

Advanced Flower Capital & ZeroStack appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.