Is AES or BEP cheaper?

On trailing earnings, AES is cheaper: AES trades at a 7.78 P/E and BEP at 58.73.

Which has grown faster, AES or BEP?

Over the past five years, BEP grew revenue faster — AES at a 4.63% CAGR versus BEP at 10.94%.

Does AES or BEP pay a bigger dividend?

AES yields 4.81% and BEP yields 4.34% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is AES or BEP more profitable?

AES runs the higher net margin — AES at 10.72% versus BEP at 3.01%.

Which has been the better investment, AES or BEP?

Over the past 10-year, BEP delivered the higher annualized total return — AES at 6.25% versus BEP at 14.22%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

The AES Corporation (AES) vs Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP)

AES leads on 11 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of The AES Corporation and Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.

$10.69B

$35.24Utilities

Total return — AES vs BEP

growth of $100 · last 23y

AES +107.4%BEP +18.0%AES compounded faster

AES BEP

AES vs BEP: by the numbers

•BEP is the larger company ($10.69B vs $10.43B market cap).
•AES trades at the lower earnings multiple (7.78 vs 58.73 P/E).
•AES converts more revenue to profit (10.72% vs 3.01% net margin).
•BEP grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.94% vs 4.63% CAGR).
•AES pays the higher dividend yield (4.81% vs 4.34%).

Which is better, AES or BEP?

Metric tally: AES 11 · BEP 4

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueAES(lower P/E)

GrowthBEP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeAES(higher dividend yield)

QualityAES(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AES	BEP
P/E ratio	7.78●	58.73
Forward P/E	6.26	—
P/S ratio	0.84●	1.68
P/B ratio	2.36●	2.54
PEG ratio	0.10●	4.33
EV / EBITDA	10.61	9.27●

Profitability

Metric	AES	BEP
Gross margin	19.31%	34.36%●
Operating margin	16.47%●	11.33%
Net margin	10.72%●	3.01%
ROE	30.27%●	4.56%
ROIC	4.24%●	1.03%

Dividends

Metric	AES	BEP
Dividend yield	4.81%●	4.34%
Payout ratio	55.86%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AES	BEP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.63%	10.94%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	78.27%●	-20.67%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	3.29%●	-7.80%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-6.68%	3.26%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, AES or BEP?: It depends on your goal. value: AES (lower P/E); growth: BEP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: AES (higher dividend yield); quality: AES (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AES leads 11 to 4.
Is AES or BEP cheaper?: On trailing earnings, AES is cheaper: AES trades at a 7.78 P/E and BEP at 58.73.
Which has grown faster, AES or BEP?: Over the past five years, BEP grew revenue faster — AES at a 4.63% CAGR versus BEP at 10.94%.
Does AES or BEP pay a bigger dividend?: AES yields 4.81% and BEP yields 4.34% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is AES or BEP more profitable?: AES runs the higher net margin — AES at 10.72% versus BEP at 3.01%.
Which has been the better investment, AES or BEP?: Over the past 10-year, BEP delivered the higher annualized total return — AES at 6.25% versus BEP at 14.22%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AES analysis Full BEP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

AES P/E ratio Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. P/E ratio AES dividend yield Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. dividend yield AES ROE Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. ROE AES operating margin Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. operating margin AES revenue growth Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. revenue growth AES free cash flow Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. free cash flow

AES & Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 20, 2026.