Ameren Corporation (AEE) vs Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO)
ATO leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics, though AEE is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Ameren Corporation and Atmos Energy Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — AEE vs ATO
growth of $100 · last 30yAEE +187.0%ATO +596.9%ATO compounded faster
AEE ATO
AEE vs ATO: by the numbers
- •AEE is the larger company ($30.58B vs $28.49B market cap).
- •AEE trades at the lower earnings multiple (19.87 vs 20.86 P/E).
- •ATO converts more revenue to profit (27.58% vs 17.17% net margin).
- •ATO grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.80% vs 8.44% CAGR).
- •AEE pays the higher dividend yield (2.64% vs 2.28%).
Which is better, AEE or ATO?
Metric tally: AEE 6 · ATO 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueAEE(lower P/E)
GrowthATO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeAEE(higher dividend yield)
QualityATO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AEE | ATO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 19.87● | 20.86 |
| Forward P/E | 19.03 | 18.93 |
| P/S ratio | 3.46● | 5.83 |
| P/B ratio | 2.27 | 1.91● |
| PEG ratio | 0.87● | 2.18 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.79● | 14.71 |
Profitability
| Metric | AEE | ATO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 39.38% | 51.43%● |
| Operating margin | 23.97% | 35.87%● |
| Net margin | 17.17% | 27.58%● |
| ROE | 11.24%● | 9.03% |
| ROIC | 4.01% | 4.58%● |
Dividends
| Metric | AEE | ATO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.64%● | 2.28% |
| Payout ratio | 54.28% | 51.33% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AEE | ATO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.44% | 8.80%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 8.79% | 9.05%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -39.48% | 19.32%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 8.80% | 13.95%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AEE or ATO?
- It depends on your goal. value: AEE (lower P/E); growth: ATO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: AEE (higher dividend yield); quality: ATO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ATO leads 9 to 6.
- Is AEE or ATO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, AEE is cheaper: AEE trades at a 19.87 P/E and ATO at 20.86.
- Which has grown faster, AEE or ATO?
- Over the past five years, ATO grew revenue faster — AEE at a 8.44% CAGR versus ATO at 8.80%.
- Does AEE or ATO pay a bigger dividend?
- AEE yields 2.64% and ATO yields 2.28% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AEE or ATO more profitable?
- ATO runs the higher net margin — AEE at 17.17% versus ATO at 27.58%.
- Which has been the better investment, AEE or ATO?
- Over the past 10-year, AEE delivered the higher annualized total return — AEE at 11.18% versus ATO at 10.97%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Ameren P/E ratioAtmos Energy P/E ratioAmeren dividend yieldAtmos Energy dividend yieldAmeren ROEAtmos Energy ROEAmeren operating marginAtmos Energy operating marginAmeren revenue growthAtmos Energy revenue growthAmeren free cash flowAtmos Energy free cash flow
Ameren & Atmos Energy appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.