Which has the lower trailing P/E, ADSK or MCHP?

ADSK has the lower trailing P/E: ADSK trades at 27.51 and MCHP at 102.91. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ADSK or MCHP?

Over the past five years, ADSK grew revenue faster — ADSK at a 14.03% CAGR versus MCHP at -2.11%.

Does ADSK or MCHP pay a bigger dividend?

MCHP pays a dividend (2.54% yield), while ADSK is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is ADSK or MCHP more profitable?

ADSK runs the higher net margin — ADSK at 21.08% versus MCHP at 8.80%.

How have ADSK and MCHP total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ADSK delivered 12.21% and MCHP delivered 11.44% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) vs Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP)

A side-by-side comparison of Autodesk, Inc. and Microchip Technology Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ADSK

Autodesk, Inc.

$44.85B

$212.40TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MCHP

Microchip Technology Incorporated

$40.29B

$74.20TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — ADSK vs MCHP

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

ADSK +208.5% (+11.9%/yr)MCHP +186.6% (+11.1%/yr)ADSK compounded faster over this window

ADSK MCHP

ADSK vs MCHP: by the numbers

•ADSK is the larger company ($44.85B vs $40.29B market cap).
•ADSK trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (27.51 vs 102.91 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ADSK converts more revenue to profit (21.08% vs 8.80% net margin).
•ADSK grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.03% vs -2.11% CAGR).
•MCHP pays a dividend (2.54% yield), while ADSK is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ADSK	MCHP
P/E ratio	27.51	102.91
Forward P/E	16.86	N/A
P/S ratio	5.76	7.87
P/B ratio	13.26	6.25
EV / EBITDA	18.94	30.90
FCF yield	6.31%	2.76%

Profitability

Metric	ADSK	MCHP
Gross margin	91.25%	60.19%
Operating margin	27.55%	15.52%
Net margin	21.08%	8.80%
ROE	48.54%	6.98%
ROIC	21.19%	5.01%

Dividends

Metric	ADSK	MCHP
Dividend yield	N/A	2.54%
Payout ratio	N/A	252.43%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ADSK	MCHP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	14.03%	-2.11%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-0.85%	-16.62%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	14.04%	-9.94%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-5.74%	0.27%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ADSK or MCHP?: ADSK has the lower trailing P/E: ADSK trades at 27.51 and MCHP at 102.91. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ADSK or MCHP?: Over the past five years, ADSK grew revenue faster — ADSK at a 14.03% CAGR versus MCHP at -2.11%.
Does ADSK or MCHP pay a bigger dividend?: MCHP pays a dividend (2.54% yield), while ADSK is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is ADSK or MCHP more profitable?: ADSK runs the higher net margin — ADSK at 21.08% versus MCHP at 8.80%.
How have ADSK and MCHP total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ADSK delivered 12.21% and MCHP delivered 11.44% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ADSK analysis Full MCHP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Autodesk P/E ratio Microchip Technology P/E ratio Microchip Technology dividend yield Autodesk ROE Microchip Technology ROE Autodesk operating margin Microchip Technology operating margin Autodesk revenue growth Microchip Technology revenue growth Autodesk free cash flow Microchip Technology free cash flow

Autodesk & Microchip Technology appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.