Is ADSK or MCHP cheaper?

On trailing earnings, ADSK is cheaper: ADSK trades at a 28.93 P/E and MCHP at 359.53.

Which has grown faster, ADSK or MCHP?

Over the past five years, ADSK grew revenue faster — ADSK at a 14.03% CAGR versus MCHP at -2.82%.

Does ADSK or MCHP pay a bigger dividend?

MCHP pays a dividend (1.91% yield) while ADSK does not currently pay one.

Is ADSK or MCHP more profitable?

ADSK runs the higher net margin — ADSK at 19.49% versus MCHP at 4.29%.

Which has been the better investment, ADSK or MCHP?

Over the past 10-year, MCHP delivered the higher annualized total return — ADSK at 13.44% versus MCHP at 15.96%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) vs Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP)

ADSK leads on 13 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Autodesk, Inc. and Microchip Technology Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Microchip Technology Incorporated

$51.63B

$95.24Technology

Total return — ADSK vs MCHP

growth of $100 · last 30y

ADSK +2380.4%MCHP +4095.6%MCHP compounded faster

ADSK MCHP

ADSK vs MCHP: by the numbers

•MCHP is the larger company ($51.63B vs $41.90B market cap).
•ADSK trades at the lower earnings multiple (28.93 vs 359.53 P/E).
•ADSK converts more revenue to profit (19.49% vs 4.29% net margin).
•ADSK grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.03% vs -2.82% CAGR).
•MCHP pays a dividend (1.91% yield) while ADSK does not currently pay one.

Which is better, ADSK or MCHP?

Metric tally: ADSK 13 · MCHP 2

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueADSK(lower P/E)

GrowthADSK(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityADSK(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ADSK	MCHP
P/E ratio	28.93●	359.53
Forward P/E	13.98	—
P/S ratio	5.60●	11.07
P/B ratio	13.19	8.11●
PEG ratio	22.52●	519.48
EV / EBITDA	19.90●	80.79
FCF yield	6.49%●	1.67%

Profitability

Metric	ADSK	MCHP
Gross margin	91.14%●	57.73%
Operating margin	26.60%●	10.40%
Net margin	19.49%●	4.29%
ROE	45.88%●	3.14%
ROIC	18.74%●	3.11%

Dividends

Metric	ADSK	MCHP
Dividend yield	—	1.91%
Payout ratio	—	674.07%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ADSK	MCHP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	14.03%●	-2.82%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-0.85%●	-16.62%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	15.08%●	-13.74%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-6.49%	6.56%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, ADSK or MCHP?: It depends on your goal. value: ADSK (lower P/E); growth: ADSK (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ADSK (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ADSK leads 13 to 2.
Is ADSK or MCHP cheaper?: On trailing earnings, ADSK is cheaper: ADSK trades at a 28.93 P/E and MCHP at 359.53.
Which has grown faster, ADSK or MCHP?: Over the past five years, ADSK grew revenue faster — ADSK at a 14.03% CAGR versus MCHP at -2.82%.
Does ADSK or MCHP pay a bigger dividend?: MCHP pays a dividend (1.91% yield) while ADSK does not currently pay one.
Is ADSK or MCHP more profitable?: ADSK runs the higher net margin — ADSK at 19.49% versus MCHP at 4.29%.
Which has been the better investment, ADSK or MCHP?: Over the past 10-year, MCHP delivered the higher annualized total return — ADSK at 13.44% versus MCHP at 15.96%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ADSK analysis Full MCHP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Autodesk P/E ratio Microchip Technology P/E ratio Autodesk dividend yield Microchip Technology dividend yield Autodesk ROE Microchip Technology ROE Autodesk operating margin Microchip Technology operating margin Autodesk revenue growth Microchip Technology revenue growth Autodesk free cash flow Microchip Technology free cash flow

Autodesk & Microchip Technology appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.