Which has the lower trailing P/E, ADSK or CLS?

ADSK has the lower trailing P/E: ADSK trades at 27.46 and CLS at 38.52. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ADSK or CLS?

Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — ADSK at a 14.03% CAGR versus CLS at 22.80%.

Is ADSK or CLS more profitable?

ADSK runs the higher net margin — ADSK at 21.08% versus CLS at 7.16%.

How have ADSK and CLS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ADSK delivered 12.25% and CLS delivered 41.66% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) vs Celestica Inc. (CLS)

A side-by-side comparison of Autodesk, Inc. and Celestica Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ADSK

Autodesk, Inc.

$44.75B

$211.96TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 24, 2026, 2:40 PM EDT

CLS

Celestica Inc.

$42.66B

$370.98TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 24, 2026, 2:40 PM EDT

Total return — ADSK vs CLS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

ADSK +209.6% (+12.0%/yr)CLS +3271.1% (+42.2%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

ADSK CLS

ADSK vs CLS: by the numbers

•ADSK is the larger company ($44.75B vs $42.66B market cap).
•ADSK trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (27.46 vs 38.52 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ADSK converts more revenue to profit (21.08% vs 7.16% net margin).
•CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 14.03% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ADSK	CLS
P/E ratio	27.46	38.52
Forward P/E	16.83	32.69
P/S ratio	5.74	2.73
P/B ratio	13.23	17.20
EV / EBITDA	18.90	29.69
FCF yield	6.33%	1.22%

Profitability

Metric	ADSK	CLS
Gross margin	91.25%	11.59%
Operating margin	27.55%	8.13%
Net margin	21.08%	7.16%
ROE	48.54%	45.07%
ROIC	21.19%	29.75%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ADSK	CLS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	14.03%	22.80%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-0.85%	73.33%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	14.04%	29.00%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-5.67%	108.65%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ADSK or CLS?: ADSK has the lower trailing P/E: ADSK trades at 27.46 and CLS at 38.52. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ADSK or CLS?: Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — ADSK at a 14.03% CAGR versus CLS at 22.80%.
Is ADSK or CLS more profitable?: ADSK runs the higher net margin — ADSK at 21.08% versus CLS at 7.16%.
How have ADSK and CLS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ADSK delivered 12.25% and CLS delivered 41.66% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ADSK analysis Full CLS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Autodesk P/E ratio Celestica P/E ratio Autodesk ROE Celestica ROE Autodesk operating margin Celestica operating margin Autodesk revenue growth Celestica revenue growth Autodesk free cash flow Celestica free cash flow

Autodesk & Celestica appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.