Is ADSK or CLS cheaper?

On trailing earnings, ADSK is cheaper: ADSK trades at a 28.25 P/E and CLS at 44.99.

Which has grown faster, ADSK or CLS?

Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — ADSK at a 14.03% CAGR versus CLS at 19.51%.

Is ADSK or CLS more profitable?

ADSK runs the higher net margin — ADSK at 19.49% versus CLS at 6.95%.

Which has been the better investment, ADSK or CLS?

Over the past 10-year, CLS delivered the higher annualized total return — ADSK at 13.08% versus CLS at 43.02%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) vs Celestica Inc. (CLS)

ADSK and CLS are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.

A side-by-side comparison of Autodesk, Inc. and Celestica Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 19, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — ADSK vs CLS

growth of $100 · last 28y

ADSK +1907.2%CLS +3873.9%CLS compounded faster

ADSK CLS

ADSK vs CLS: by the numbers

•CLS is the larger company ($42.83B vs $40.92B market cap).
•ADSK trades at the lower earnings multiple (28.25 vs 44.99 P/E).
•ADSK converts more revenue to profit (19.49% vs 6.95% net margin).
•CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (19.51% vs 14.03% CAGR).

Which is better, ADSK or CLS?

Metric tally: ADSK 8 · CLS 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueADSK(lower P/E)

GrowthCLS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityCLS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ADSK	CLS
P/E ratio	28.25●	44.99
Forward P/E	13.65●	37.36
P/S ratio	5.47	3.12●
P/B ratio	12.88●	21.04
PEG ratio	22.51	0.39●
EV / EBITDA	18.98●	31.98
FCF yield	6.64%●	1.14%

Profitability

Metric	ADSK	CLS
Gross margin	91.14%●	11.61%
Operating margin	26.60%●	7.84%
Net margin	19.49%●	6.95%
ROE	45.88%	46.86%●
ROIC	18.74%	27.74%●

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ADSK	CLS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	14.03%	19.51%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-0.85%	73.33%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	15.08%	26.52%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-6.96%	116.87%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, ADSK or CLS?: It depends on your goal. value: ADSK (lower P/E); growth: CLS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CLS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
Is ADSK or CLS cheaper?: On trailing earnings, ADSK is cheaper: ADSK trades at a 28.25 P/E and CLS at 44.99.
Which has grown faster, ADSK or CLS?: Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — ADSK at a 14.03% CAGR versus CLS at 19.51%.
Is ADSK or CLS more profitable?: ADSK runs the higher net margin — ADSK at 19.49% versus CLS at 6.95%.
Which has been the better investment, ADSK or CLS?: Over the past 10-year, CLS delivered the higher annualized total return — ADSK at 13.08% versus CLS at 43.02%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ADSK analysis Full CLS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Autodesk P/E ratio Celestica P/E ratio Autodesk dividend yield Celestica dividend yield Autodesk ROE Celestica ROE Autodesk operating margin Celestica operating margin Autodesk revenue growth Celestica revenue growth Autodesk free cash flow Celestica free cash flow

Autodesk & Celestica appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 19, 2026.