Which has the lower trailing P/E, ADSK or CLS?

ADSK has the lower trailing P/E: ADSK trades at 34.21 and CLS at 35.50. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ADSK or CLS?

Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — ADSK at a 14.03% CAGR versus CLS at 22.80%.

Is ADSK or CLS more profitable?

ADSK runs the higher net margin — ADSK at 19.49% versus CLS at 7.16%.

How have ADSK and CLS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ADSK delivered 15.02% and CLS delivered 40.80% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) vs Celestica Inc. (CLS)

A side-by-side comparison of Autodesk, Inc. and Celestica Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 4, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ADSK

Autodesk, Inc.

$49.65B

$235.17TechnologyDelayed quote: Aug 4, 2026, 1:50 PM EDT

CLS

Celestica Inc.

$42.97B

$373.69TechnologyDelayed quote: Aug 4, 2026, 1:50 PM EDT

Total return — ADSK vs CLS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 28y

ADSK +2265.2%CLS +3547.0%CLS compounded faster

ADSK CLS

ADSK vs CLS: by the numbers

•ADSK is the larger company ($49.65B vs $42.97B market cap).
•ADSK trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (34.21 vs 35.50 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ADSK converts more revenue to profit (19.49% vs 7.16% net margin).
•CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 14.03% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ADSK	CLS
P/E ratio	34.21	35.50
Forward P/E	22.93	30.07
P/S ratio	6.63	2.54
P/B ratio	15.60	16.02
PEG ratio	22.51	0.39
EV / EBITDA	22.69	27.67
FCF yield	5.49%	1.31%

Profitability

Metric	ADSK	CLS
Gross margin	91.14%	11.59%
Operating margin	26.60%	8.13%
Net margin	19.49%	7.16%
ROE	45.88%	45.07%
ROIC	18.74%	27.74%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ADSK	CLS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	14.03%	22.80%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-0.85%	73.33%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	15.08%	29.00%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-6.45%	106.59%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ADSK or CLS?: ADSK has the lower trailing P/E: ADSK trades at 34.21 and CLS at 35.50. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ADSK or CLS?: Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — ADSK at a 14.03% CAGR versus CLS at 22.80%.
Is ADSK or CLS more profitable?: ADSK runs the higher net margin — ADSK at 19.49% versus CLS at 7.16%.
How have ADSK and CLS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ADSK delivered 15.02% and CLS delivered 40.80% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ADSK analysis Full CLS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Autodesk P/E ratio Celestica P/E ratio Autodesk dividend yield Celestica dividend yield Autodesk ROE Celestica ROE Autodesk operating margin Celestica operating margin Autodesk revenue growth Celestica revenue growth Autodesk free cash flow Celestica free cash flow

Autodesk & Celestica appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 4, 2026.