ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) vs Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RXRX)

A side-by-side comparison of ADMA Biologics, Inc. and Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — ADMA vs RXRX

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y
ADMA +487.8% (+42.5%/yr)RXRX -73.4% (-23.3%/yr)ADMA compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
101001k10kStart $10020222023202420252026$588$27
ADMA RXRX

ADMA vs RXRX: by the numbers

  • •RXRX is the larger company ($2.51B vs $2.34B market cap).
  • •ADMA is profitable (32.98% net margin) while RXRX runs a net loss (-945.92%).
  • •ADMA grew revenue faster over the past five years (54.55% vs 45.50% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricADMARXRX
P/E ratio14.44N/A
Forward P/E12.69N/A
P/S ratio4.5745.72
P/B ratio5.742.74
EV / EBITDA10.67N/A
FCF yield4.97%N/A

Profitability

MetricADMARXRX
Gross margin64.71%-61.96%
Operating margin42.26%-867.87%
Net margin32.98%-945.92%
ROE41.39%-56.71%
ROIC27.60%-49.78%

Growth (annualized)

MetricADMARXRX
Revenue CAGR (5Y)54.55%45.50%
Total return CAGR (5Y)54.74%-25.86%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, ADMA or RXRX?
Over the past five years, ADMA grew revenue faster — ADMA at a 54.55% CAGR versus RXRX at 45.50%.
Is ADMA or RXRX more profitable?
ADMA runs the higher net margin — ADMA at 32.98% versus RXRX at -945.92%.
How have ADMA and RXRX total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, ADMA delivered 54.74% and RXRX delivered -25.86% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.