Which has the lower trailing P/E, ADM or MNST?

ADM has the lower trailing P/E: ADM trades at 22.00 and MNST at 44.05. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ADM or MNST?

Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — ADM at a 1.85% CAGR versus MNST at 12.36%.

Does ADM or MNST pay a bigger dividend?

ADM pays a dividend (2.58% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is ADM or MNST more profitable?

MNST runs the higher net margin — ADM at 2.16% versus MNST at 23.08%.

How have ADM and MNST total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ADM delivered 9.51% and MNST delivered 13.65% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)

A side-by-side comparison of Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Monster Beverage Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 23, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ADM

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company

$38.70B

$80.30Consumer DefensiveAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

MNST

Monster Beverage Corporation

$93.48B

$47.79Consumer DefensiveAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — ADM vs MNST

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

ADM +148.1% (+9.5%/yr)MNST +265.1% (+13.8%/yr)MNST compounded faster over this window

ADM MNST

ADM vs MNST: by the numbers

•MNST is the larger company ($93.48B vs $38.70B market cap).
•ADM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (22.00 vs 44.05 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.08% vs 2.16% net margin).
•MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.36% vs 1.85% CAGR).
•ADM pays a dividend (2.58% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ADM	MNST
P/E ratio	22.00	44.05
Forward P/E	15.34	41.27
P/S ratio	0.47	10.25
P/B ratio	1.65	10.09
EV / EBITDA	9.53	31.93
FCF yield	4.31%	2.22%

Profitability

Metric	ADM	MNST
Gross margin	6.87%	55.55%
Operating margin	2.46%	29.16%
Net margin	2.16%	23.08%
ROE	7.51%	22.72%
ROIC	4.89%	21.32%

Dividends

Metric	ADM	MNST
Dividend yield	2.58%	N/A
Payout ratio	92.83%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ADM	MNST
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	1.85%	12.36%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-6.73%	7.95%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	58.63%	7.93%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	9.44%	14.58%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ADM or MNST?: ADM has the lower trailing P/E: ADM trades at 22.00 and MNST at 44.05. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ADM or MNST?: Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — ADM at a 1.85% CAGR versus MNST at 12.36%.
Does ADM or MNST pay a bigger dividend?: ADM pays a dividend (2.58% yield), while MNST is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is ADM or MNST more profitable?: MNST runs the higher net margin — ADM at 2.16% versus MNST at 23.08%.
How have ADM and MNST total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ADM delivered 9.51% and MNST delivered 13.65% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ADM analysis Full MNST analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Archer-Daniels-Midl P/E ratio Monster Beverage P/E ratio Archer-Daniels-Midl dividend yield Archer-Daniels-Midl ROE Monster Beverage ROE Archer-Daniels-Midl operating margin Monster Beverage operating margin Archer-Daniels-Midl revenue growth Monster Beverage revenue growth Archer-Daniels-Midl free cash flow Monster Beverage free cash flow

Archer-Daniels-Midl & Monster Beverage appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks 25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 23, 2026.