Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) vs Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST)
MNST leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics, though ADM is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Monster Beverage Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
$78.98Consumer Defensive
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
$96.55Consumer Defensive
Total return — ADM vs MNST
growth of $100 · last 30yADM +481.8%MNST +374639.1%MNST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
ADM MNST
ADM vs MNST: by the numbers
- •MNST is the larger company ($94.43B vs $38.06B market cap).
- •ADM trades at the lower earnings multiple (36.00 vs 45.97 P/E).
- •MNST converts more revenue to profit (23.11% vs 1.34% net margin).
- •MNST grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.96% vs 3.38% CAGR).
- •ADM pays a dividend (2.59% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
Which is better, ADM or MNST?
Metric tally: ADM 7 · MNST 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueADM(lower P/E)
GrowthMNST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityMNST(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ADM | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 36.00● | 45.97 |
| Forward P/E | 17.26● | 41.43 |
| P/S ratio | 0.48● | 10.69 |
| P/B ratio | 1.70● | 10.77 |
| PEG ratio | — | 1.31 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.98● | 34.10 |
| FCF yield | 12.33%● | 2.20% |
Profitability
| Metric | ADM | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 5.83% | 55.47%● |
| Operating margin | 1.52% | 29.34%● |
| Net margin | 1.34% | 23.11%● |
| ROE | 4.74% | 23.28%● |
| ROIC | 3.51% | 21.74%● |
Dividends
| Metric | ADM | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.59% | — |
| Payout ratio | 93.27% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ADM | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.38% | 12.96%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -6.73% | 7.95%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 18.75%● | 10.53% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 9.36% | 16.20%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ADM or MNST?
- It depends on your goal. value: ADM (lower P/E); growth: MNST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: MNST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MNST leads 8 to 7.
- Is ADM or MNST cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ADM is cheaper: ADM trades at a 36.00 P/E and MNST at 45.97.
- Which has grown faster, ADM or MNST?
- Over the past five years, MNST grew revenue faster — ADM at a 3.38% CAGR versus MNST at 12.96%.
- Does ADM or MNST pay a bigger dividend?
- ADM pays a dividend (2.59% yield) while MNST does not currently pay one.
- Is ADM or MNST more profitable?
- MNST runs the higher net margin — ADM at 1.34% versus MNST at 23.11%.
- Which has been the better investment, ADM or MNST?
- Over the past 10-year, MNST delivered the higher annualized total return — ADM at 9.52% versus MNST at 13.46%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Archer-Daniels-Midland P/E ratioMonster Beverage P/E ratioArcher-Daniels-Midland dividend yieldMonster Beverage dividend yieldArcher-Daniels-Midland ROEMonster Beverage ROEArcher-Daniels-Midland operating marginMonster Beverage operating marginArcher-Daniels-Midland revenue growthMonster Beverage revenue growthArcher-Daniels-Midland free cash flowMonster Beverage free cash flow
Archer-Daniels-Midland & Monster Beverage appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.