Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) vs Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ)
A side-by-side comparison of Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Mondelez International, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
$79.84Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Aug 10, 2026, 12:50 PM EDT
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
$61.65Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Aug 10, 2026, 12:50 PM EDT
Total return — ADM vs MDLZ
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yADM +131.5% (+8.8%/yr)MDLZ +83.8% (+6.3%/yr)ADM compounded faster over this window
ADM MDLZ
ADM vs MDLZ: by the numbers
- •MDLZ is the larger company ($78.68B vs $38.48B market cap).
- •ADM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (20.98 vs 23.10 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •MDLZ converts more revenue to profit (8.86% vs 2.16% net margin).
- •MDLZ grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.34% vs 1.85% CAGR).
- •MDLZ pays the higher dividend yield (3.19% vs 2.69%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ADM | MDLZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 20.98 | 23.10 |
| Forward P/E | 14.80 | 20.55 |
| P/S ratio | 0.45 | 2.04 |
| P/B ratio | 1.58 | 3.04 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.08 | 17.11 |
| FCF yield | 4.51% | 3.81% |
Profitability
| Metric | ADM | MDLZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 6.87% | 31.15% |
| Operating margin | 2.46% | 11.42% |
| Net margin | 2.16% | 8.86% |
| ROE | 7.51% | 13.20% |
| ROIC | 3.51% | 5.13% |
Dividends
| Metric | ADM | MDLZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.69% | 3.19% |
| Payout ratio | 92.38% | 105.82% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ADM | MDLZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 1.85% | 7.34% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -6.73% | -5.29% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 58.63% | 0.85% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 7.91% | 2.97% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, ADM or MDLZ?
- ADM has the lower trailing P/E: ADM trades at 20.98 and MDLZ at 23.10. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, ADM or MDLZ?
- Over the past five years, MDLZ grew revenue faster — ADM at a 1.85% CAGR versus MDLZ at 7.34%.
- Does ADM or MDLZ pay a bigger dividend?
- ADM yields 2.69% and MDLZ yields 3.19% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ADM or MDLZ more profitable?
- MDLZ runs the higher net margin — ADM at 2.16% versus MDLZ at 8.86%.
- How have ADM and MDLZ total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, ADM delivered 8.75% and MDLZ delivered 6.25% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Archer-Daniels-Midl P/E ratioMondelez International P/E ratioArcher-Daniels-Midl dividend yieldMondelez International dividend yieldArcher-Daniels-Midl ROEMondelez International ROEArcher-Daniels-Midl operating marginMondelez International operating marginArcher-Daniels-Midl revenue growthMondelez International revenue growthArcher-Daniels-Midl free cash flowMondelez International free cash flow
Archer-Daniels-Midl & Mondelez International appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 10, 2026.