Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) vs Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ)
MDLZ leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Mondelez International, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
$76.54Consumer Defensive
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
$61.20Consumer Defensive
Total return — ADM vs MDLZ
growth of $100 · last 25yADM +473.8%MDLZ +199.3%ADM compounded faster
ADM MDLZ
ADM vs MDLZ: by the numbers
- •MDLZ is the larger company ($78.56B vs $36.89B market cap).
- •MDLZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (30.60 vs 34.32 P/E).
- •MDLZ converts more revenue to profit (6.64% vs 1.34% net margin).
- •MDLZ grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.71% vs 3.38% CAGR).
- •MDLZ pays the higher dividend yield (3.22% vs 2.69%).
Which is better, ADM or MDLZ?
Metric tally: ADM 7 · MDLZ 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMDLZ(lower P/E)
GrowthMDLZ(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeMDLZ(higher dividend yield)
QualityMDLZ(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ADM | MDLZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 34.32 | 30.60● |
| Forward P/E | 14.07● | 18.10 |
| P/S ratio | 0.46● | 2.01 |
| P/B ratio | 1.62● | 3.07 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.09● | 19.33 |
| FCF yield | 12.94%● | 3.26% |
Profitability
| Metric | ADM | MDLZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 5.83% | 28.77%● |
| Operating margin | 1.52% | 9.55%● |
| Net margin | 1.34% | 6.64%● |
| ROE | 4.74% | 10.13%● |
| ROIC | 3.51% | 5.13%● |
Dividends
| Metric | ADM | MDLZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.69% | 3.22%● |
| Payout ratio | 92.38% | 104.23% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ADM | MDLZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.38% | 7.71%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -6.73% | -5.29%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 18.75%● | -7.14% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 7.49%● | 1.97% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ADM or MDLZ?
- It depends on your goal. value: MDLZ (lower P/E); growth: MDLZ (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MDLZ (higher dividend yield); quality: MDLZ (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MDLZ leads 9 to 7.
- Is ADM or MDLZ cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MDLZ is cheaper: ADM trades at a 34.32 P/E and MDLZ at 30.60.
- Which has grown faster, ADM or MDLZ?
- Over the past five years, MDLZ grew revenue faster — ADM at a 3.38% CAGR versus MDLZ at 7.71%.
- Does ADM or MDLZ pay a bigger dividend?
- ADM yields 2.69% and MDLZ yields 3.22% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ADM or MDLZ more profitable?
- MDLZ runs the higher net margin — ADM at 1.34% versus MDLZ at 6.64%.
- Which has been the better investment, ADM or MDLZ?
- Over the past 10-year, ADM delivered the higher annualized total return — ADM at 9.77% versus MDLZ at 6.21%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Archer-Daniels-Midland P/E ratioMondelez International P/E ratioArcher-Daniels-Midland dividend yieldMondelez International dividend yieldArcher-Daniels-Midland ROEMondelez International ROEArcher-Daniels-Midland operating marginMondelez International operating marginArcher-Daniels-Midland revenue growthMondelez International revenue growthArcher-Daniels-Midland free cash flowMondelez International free cash flow
Archer-Daniels-Midland & Mondelez International appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.