Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) vs Kimberly-Clark Corp (KMB)
KMB leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Kimberly-Clark Corp across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
$75.84Consumer Defensive
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corp
$103.95Consumer Defensive
Total return — ADM vs KMB
growth of $100 · last 30yADM +414.5%KMB +184.2%ADM compounded faster
ADM KMB
ADM vs KMB: by the numbers
- •ADM is the larger company ($36.55B vs $34.51B market cap).
- •KMB trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.32 vs 34.01 P/E).
- •KMB converts more revenue to profit (12.81% vs 1.34% net margin).
- •ADM grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.38% vs -2.61% CAGR).
- •KMB pays the higher dividend yield (4.89% vs 2.72%).
Which is better, ADM or KMB?
Metric tally: ADM 7 · KMB 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueKMB(lower P/E)
GrowthADM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeKMB(higher dividend yield)
QualityKMB(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ADM | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 34.01 | 16.32● |
| Forward P/E | 14.02 | 13.72● |
| P/S ratio | 0.46● | 2.09 |
| P/B ratio | 1.61● | 19.29 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.00● | 13.44 |
| FCF yield | 13.05%● | 7.44% |
Profitability
| Metric | ADM | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 5.83% | 35.86%● |
| Operating margin | 1.52% | 13.27%● |
| Net margin | 1.34% | 12.81%● |
| ROE | 4.74% | 117.98%● |
| ROIC | 3.51% | 17.41%● |
Dividends
| Metric | ADM | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.72% | 4.89%● |
| Payout ratio | 92.38% | 83.55% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ADM | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.38%● | -2.61% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -6.73% | -2.50%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 18.75%● | 3.38% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 7.36%● | -0.71% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ADM or KMB?
- It depends on your goal. value: KMB (lower P/E); growth: ADM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: KMB (higher dividend yield); quality: KMB (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, KMB leads 9 to 7.
- Is ADM or KMB cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, KMB is cheaper: ADM trades at a 34.01 P/E and KMB at 16.32.
- Which has grown faster, ADM or KMB?
- Over the past five years, ADM grew revenue faster — ADM at a 3.38% CAGR versus KMB at -2.61%.
- Does ADM or KMB pay a bigger dividend?
- ADM yields 2.72% and KMB yields 4.89% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ADM or KMB more profitable?
- KMB runs the higher net margin — ADM at 1.34% versus KMB at 12.81%.
- Which has been the better investment, ADM or KMB?
- Over the past 10-year, ADM delivered the higher annualized total return — ADM at 9.09% versus KMB at 0.98%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Archer-Daniels-Midland P/E ratioKimberly-Clark P/E ratioArcher-Daniels-Midland dividend yieldKimberly-Clark dividend yieldArcher-Daniels-Midland ROEKimberly-Clark ROEArcher-Daniels-Midland operating marginKimberly-Clark operating marginArcher-Daniels-Midland revenue growthKimberly-Clark revenue growthArcher-Daniels-Midland free cash flowKimberly-Clark free cash flow
Archer-Daniels-Midland & Kimberly-Clark appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.