Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) vs Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB)
A side-by-side comparison of Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Kimberly-Clark Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
$82.34Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
$98.91Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 22, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — ADM vs KMB
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yADM +164.6% (+10.2%/yr)KMB +15.1% (+1.4%/yr)ADM compounded faster over this window
ADM KMB
ADM vs KMB: by the numbers
- •ADM is the larger company ($39.68B vs $32.83B market cap).
- •KMB trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (16.82 vs 22.56 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •KMB converts more revenue to profit (11.80% vs 2.16% net margin).
- •ADM grew revenue faster over the past five years (1.85% vs -2.69% CAGR).
- •KMB pays the higher dividend yield (5.20% vs 2.39%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ADM | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 22.56 | 16.82 |
| Forward P/E | 15.33 | 13.33 |
| P/S ratio | 0.48 | 1.98 |
| P/B ratio | 1.68 | 18.76 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.71 | 14.54 |
| FCF yield | 4.23% | 5.36% |
Profitability
| Metric | ADM | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 6.87% | 36.69% |
| Operating margin | 2.46% | 12.38% |
| Net margin | 2.16% | 11.80% |
| ROE | 7.51% | 111.71% |
| ROIC | 4.89% | 12.46% |
Dividends
| Metric | ADM | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.39% | 5.20% |
| Payout ratio | 56.71% | 86.73% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ADM | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 1.85% | -2.69% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -6.73% | -2.50% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 58.63% | -8.19% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 10.78% | -2.75% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, ADM or KMB?
- KMB has the lower trailing P/E: ADM trades at 22.56 and KMB at 16.82. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, ADM or KMB?
- Over the past five years, ADM grew revenue faster — ADM at a 1.85% CAGR versus KMB at -2.69%.
- Does ADM or KMB pay a bigger dividend?
- ADM yields 2.39% and KMB yields 5.20% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ADM or KMB more profitable?
- KMB runs the higher net margin — ADM at 2.16% versus KMB at 11.80%.
- How have ADM and KMB total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, ADM delivered 10.73% and KMB delivered 1.32% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Archer-Daniels-Midl P/E ratioKimberly-Clark P/E ratioArcher-Daniels-Midl dividend yieldKimberly-Clark dividend yieldArcher-Daniels-Midl ROEKimberly-Clark ROEArcher-Daniels-Midl operating marginKimberly-Clark operating marginArcher-Daniels-Midl revenue growthKimberly-Clark revenue growthArcher-Daniels-Midl free cash flowKimberly-Clark free cash flow
Archer-Daniels-Midl & Kimberly-Clark appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.