Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) vs Kellanova (K)
ADM and K are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.
A side-by-side comparison of Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Kellanova across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
$75.84Consumer Defensive
K
Kellanova
$83.44Consumer Defensive
Total return — ADM vs K
growth of $100 · last 29yADM +294.9%K +150.9%ADM compounded faster
ADM K
ADM vs K: by the numbers
- •ADM is the larger company ($36.55B vs $29.03B market cap).
- •K trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.90 vs 34.01 P/E).
- •K converts more revenue to profit (10.08% vs 1.34% net margin).
- •ADM grew revenue faster over the past five years (3.38% vs -1.30% CAGR).
- •ADM pays the higher dividend yield (2.72% vs 1.39%).
Which is better, ADM or K?
Metric tally: ADM 8 · K 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueK(lower P/E)
GrowthADM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeADM(higher dividend yield)
QualityK(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ADM | K |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 34.01 | 22.90● |
| Forward P/E | 14.02● | 22.06 |
| P/S ratio | 0.46● | 2.30 |
| P/B ratio | 1.61● | 6.95 |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.50 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.00● | 15.66 |
| FCF yield | 13.05%● | 2.05% |
Profitability
| Metric | ADM | K |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 5.83% | 34.81%● |
| Operating margin | 1.52% | 14.61%● |
| Net margin | 1.34% | 10.08%● |
| ROE | 4.74% | 30.38%● |
| ROIC | 3.51% | 12.91%● |
Dividends
| Metric | ADM | K |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.72%● | 1.39% |
| Payout ratio | 92.38% | 29.59% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ADM | K |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 3.38%● | -1.30% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -6.73% | 0.30%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 18.75%● | -15.22% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 7.36% | 11.22%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ADM or K?
- It depends on your goal. value: K (lower P/E); growth: ADM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: ADM (higher dividend yield); quality: K (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is ADM or K cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, K is cheaper: ADM trades at a 34.01 P/E and K at 22.90.
- Which has grown faster, ADM or K?
- Over the past five years, ADM grew revenue faster — ADM at a 3.38% CAGR versus K at -1.30%.
- Does ADM or K pay a bigger dividend?
- ADM yields 2.72% and K yields 1.39% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ADM or K more profitable?
- K runs the higher net margin — ADM at 1.34% versus K at 10.08%.
- Which has been the better investment, ADM or K?
- Over the past 10-year, ADM delivered the higher annualized total return — ADM at 9.09% versus K at 5.79%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Archer-Daniels-Midland P/E ratioKellanova P/E ratioArcher-Daniels-Midland dividend yieldKellanova dividend yieldArcher-Daniels-Midland ROEKellanova ROEArcher-Daniels-Midland operating marginKellanova operating marginArcher-Daniels-Midland revenue growthKellanova revenue growthArcher-Daniels-Midland free cash flowKellanova free cash flow
Archer-Daniels-Midland & Kellanova appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.