Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)
ADI leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics, though QCOM is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Analog Devices, Inc. and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — ADI vs QCOM
growth of $100 · last 30yADI +4024.3%QCOM +6751.8%QCOM compounded faster
ADI QCOM
ADI vs QCOM: by the numbers
- •QCOM is the larger company ($223.15B vs $203.50B market cap).
- •QCOM trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.72 vs 62.08 P/E).
- •ADI converts more revenue to profit (26.01% vs 22.31% net margin).
- •ADI grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.48% vs 8.63% CAGR).
- •QCOM pays the higher dividend yield (1.70% vs 1.00%).
Which is better, ADI or QCOM?
Metric tally: ADI 9 · QCOM 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueQCOM(lower P/E)
GrowthADI(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeQCOM(higher dividend yield)
QualityQCOM(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | ADI | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 62.08 | 22.72● |
| Forward P/E | 34.04 | 19.72● |
| P/S ratio | 16.08 | 5.10● |
| P/B ratio | 6.07● | 8.32 |
| PEG ratio | 1.31● | 3.96 |
| EV / EBITDA | 33.91 | 17.18● |
| FCF yield | 2.23% | 5.51%● |
Profitability
| Metric | ADI | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 64.49%● | 54.80% |
| Operating margin | 32.50%● | 25.52% |
| Net margin | 26.01%● | 22.31% |
| ROE | 9.82% | 36.38%● |
| ROIC | 5.42% | 13.15%● |
Dividends
| Metric | ADI | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.00% | 1.70%● |
| Payout ratio | 91.07% | 70.95% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ADI | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.48%● | 8.63% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 6.75%● | 5.74% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 15.54%● | 9.39% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 22.09%● | 11.87% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ADI or QCOM?
- It depends on your goal. value: QCOM (lower P/E); growth: ADI (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: QCOM (higher dividend yield); quality: QCOM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ADI leads 9 to 8.
- Is ADI or QCOM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, QCOM is cheaper: ADI trades at a 62.08 P/E and QCOM at 22.72.
- Which has grown faster, ADI or QCOM?
- Over the past five years, ADI grew revenue faster — ADI at a 15.48% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.
- Does ADI or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?
- ADI yields 1.00% and QCOM yields 1.70% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ADI or QCOM more profitable?
- ADI runs the higher net margin — ADI at 26.01% versus QCOM at 22.31%.
- Which has been the better investment, ADI or QCOM?
- Over the past 10-year, ADI delivered the higher annualized total return — ADI at 24.36% versus QCOM at 17.83%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Analog Devices P/E ratioQUALCOMM P/E ratioAnalog Devices dividend yieldQUALCOMM dividend yieldAnalog Devices ROEQUALCOMM ROEAnalog Devices operating marginQUALCOMM operating marginAnalog Devices revenue growthQUALCOMM revenue growthAnalog Devices free cash flowQUALCOMM free cash flow
Analog Devices & QUALCOMM appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.