Adamas Trust, Inc. 7.000% Series G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (ADAMZ) vs Gladstone Commercial Corp Pref (GOODN)

A side-by-side comparison of Adamas Trust, Inc. 7.000% Series G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock and Gladstone Commercial Corp Pref across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — ADAMZ vs GOODN

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y
ADAMZ +7.2% (+1.4%/yr)GOODN +8.7% (+1.7%/yr)GOODN compounded faster over this window
80100120Start $10020222023202420252026$107$109
ADAMZ GOODN

ADAMZ vs GOODN: by the numbers

  • •GOODN is the larger company ($935M vs $724M market cap).
  • •ADAMZ converts more revenue to profit (21.13% vs 14.55% net margin).
  • •ADAMZ grew revenue faster over the past five years (29.44% vs 4.89% CAGR).
  • •ADAMZ pays the higher dividend yield (10.61% vs 8.26%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricADAMZGOODN
P/E ratio9.9737.83
Forward P/EN/A80.31
PEG ratioN/A1.07
P/S ratio0.765.49
P/B ratioN/A5.94
EV / EBITDAN/A14.04
FCF yieldN/A5.80%

For REITs like Gladstone Commercial Corp Pref, GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.

Profitability

MetricADAMZGOODN
Gross marginN/A5.94%
Operating margin17.11%39.09%
Net margin21.13%14.55%
ROE13.76%15.74%
ROICN/A5.40%

Adamas Trust, Inc. 7.000% Series G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock: Gross margin is not shown for a lender or insurer: its revenue is interest, premiums and fees rather than the sale of goods, so there is no cost of goods sold to measure it against.

Dividends

MetricADAMZGOODN
Dividend yield10.61%8.26%
Payout ratio104.29%312.03%

Gladstone Commercial Corp Pref's payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.

Growth (annualized)

MetricADAMZGOODN
Revenue CAGR (5Y)29.44%4.89%
EPS CAGR (5Y)N/A35.43%
FCF CAGR (5Y)N/A2.58%
Total return CAGR (5Y)N/A1.70%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, ADAMZ or GOODN?
Over the past five years, ADAMZ grew revenue faster — ADAMZ at a 29.44% CAGR versus GOODN at 4.89%.
Does ADAMZ or GOODN pay a bigger dividend?
ADAMZ yields 10.61% and GOODN yields 8.26% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ADAMZ or GOODN more profitable?
ADAMZ runs the higher net margin — ADAMZ at 21.13% versus GOODN at 14.55%.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.