Adamas Trust, Inc. 7.000% Series G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (ADAMZ) vs Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD)
A side-by-side comparison of Adamas Trust, Inc. 7.000% Series G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock and Gladstone Commercial Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — ADAMZ vs GOOD
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5yADAMZ vs GOOD: by the numbers
- •ADAMZ is the larger company ($721M vs $622M market cap).
- •ADAMZ converts more revenue to profit (21.13% vs 14.55% net margin).
- •ADAMZ grew revenue faster over the past five years (29.44% vs 4.89% CAGR).
- •ADAMZ pays the higher dividend yield (10.61% vs 9.38%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ADAMZ | GOOD |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.93 | 24.20 |
| Forward P/E | N/A | 51.38 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 0.68 |
| P/S ratio | 0.75 | 3.65 |
| P/B ratio | N/A | 3.95 |
| EV / EBITDA | N/A | 11.57 |
| FCF yield | N/A | 8.72% |
For REITs like Gladstone Commercial Corporation, GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.
Profitability
| Metric | ADAMZ | GOOD |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | N/A | 5.94% |
| Operating margin | 17.11% | 39.09% |
| Net margin | 21.13% | 14.55% |
| ROE | 13.76% | 15.74% |
| ROIC | N/A | 5.40% |
Adamas Trust, Inc. 7.000% Series G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock: Gross margin is not shown for a lender or insurer: its revenue is interest, premiums and fees rather than the sale of goods, so there is no cost of goods sold to measure it against.
Dividends
| Metric | ADAMZ | GOOD |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 10.61% | 9.38% |
| Payout ratio | 104.29% | 226.07% |
Gladstone Commercial Corporation's payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ADAMZ | GOOD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 29.44% | 4.89% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 35.43% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 2.58% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -1.64% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, ADAMZ or GOOD?
- Over the past five years, ADAMZ grew revenue faster — ADAMZ at a 29.44% CAGR versus GOOD at 4.89%.
- Does ADAMZ or GOOD pay a bigger dividend?
- ADAMZ yields 10.61% and GOOD yields 9.38% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ADAMZ or GOOD more profitable?
- ADAMZ runs the higher net margin — ADAMZ at 21.13% versus GOOD at 14.55%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Adamas Trust, Inc. 7.000% Series G Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock & Gladstone Commercial appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.