Adamas Trust, Inc. - 6.875% Series F Fixed-to-Floating Rate Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share (ADAML) vs Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD)

A side-by-side comparison of Adamas Trust, Inc. - 6.875% Series F Fixed-to-Floating Rate Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share and Gladstone Commercial Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — ADAML vs GOOD

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5y
ADAML +49.5% (+8.4%/yr)GOOD -10.6% (-2.2%/yr)ADAML compounded faster over this window
6080100120140Start $10020222023202420252026$149$89
ADAML GOOD

ADAML vs GOOD: by the numbers

  • •ADAML is the larger company ($816M vs $619M market cap).
  • •ADAML converts more revenue to profit (21.13% vs 14.55% net margin).
  • •ADAML grew revenue faster over the past five years (29.44% vs 4.89% CAGR).
  • •GOOD pays the higher dividend yield (9.38% vs 7.03%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricADAMLGOOD
P/E ratio14.5724.10
Forward P/EN/A51.16
PEG ratioN/A0.68
P/S ratio0.853.64
P/B ratioN/A3.93
EV / EBITDAN/A11.55
FCF yieldN/A8.75%

For REITs like Gladstone Commercial Corporation, GAAP P/E is distorted: heavy non-cash property depreciation depresses reported earnings and overstates the multiple. Real-estate companies are valued on funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) and price-to-FFO — see the Funds From Operations section. The P/E is shown for reference only.

Profitability

MetricADAMLGOOD
Gross marginN/A5.94%
Operating margin17.11%39.09%
Net margin21.13%14.55%
ROE13.76%15.74%
ROICN/A5.40%

Adamas Trust, Inc. - 6.875% Series F Fixed-to-Floating Rate Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share: Gross margin is not shown for a lender or insurer: its revenue is interest, premiums and fees rather than the sale of goods, so there is no cost of goods sold to measure it against.

Dividends

MetricADAMLGOOD
Dividend yield7.03%9.38%
Payout ratio102.38%226.07%

Gladstone Commercial Corporation's payout ratio is measured against GAAP earnings, which non-cash depreciation depresses for REITs — the dividend is conventionally assessed against funds from operations (FFO / AFFO) instead, so the GAAP figure overstates the payout burden.

Growth (annualized)

MetricADAMLGOOD
Revenue CAGR (5Y)29.44%4.89%
EPS CAGR (5Y)N/A35.43%
FCF CAGR (5Y)N/A2.58%
Total return CAGR (5Y)8.48%-1.64%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, ADAML or GOOD?
Over the past five years, ADAML grew revenue faster — ADAML at a 29.44% CAGR versus GOOD at 4.89%.
Does ADAML or GOOD pay a bigger dividend?
ADAML yields 7.03% and GOOD yields 9.38% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ADAML or GOOD more profitable?
ADAML runs the higher net margin — ADAML at 21.13% versus GOOD at 14.55%.
How have ADAML and GOOD total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, ADAML delivered 8.48% and GOOD delivered -1.64% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.