Acacia Research Corporation (ACTG) vs Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN)
A side-by-side comparison of Acacia Research Corporation and Twin Disc, Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
ACTG
Acacia Research Corporation
$4.37IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
TWIN
Twin Disc, Incorporated
$28.56IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — ACTG vs TWIN
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yACTG -28.3% (-3.3%/yr)TWIN +143.3% (+9.3%/yr)TWIN compounded faster over this window
ACTG TWIN
ACTG vs TWIN: by the numbers
- •ACTG is the larger company ($422M vs $412M market cap).
- •TWIN is profitable (7.10% net margin) while ACTG runs a net loss (-5.39%).
- •ACTG grew revenue faster over the past five years (42.70% vs 11.77% CAGR).
- •TWIN pays a dividend (0.59% yield), while ACTG is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ACTG | TWIN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | N/A | 15.33 |
| Forward P/E | N/A | 38.59 |
| P/S ratio | 1.52 | 1.08 |
| P/B ratio | 0.80 | 1.88 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.41 | 13.91 |
| FCF yield | 0.22% | 2.23% |
Profitability
| Metric | ACTG | TWIN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 82.47% | 26.90% |
| Operating margin | 2.25% | 4.71% |
| Net margin | -5.39% | 7.10% |
| ROE | -2.85% | 12.33% |
| ROIC | -2.79% | 6.24% |
Dividends
| Metric | ACTG | TWIN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.59% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 9.13% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ACTG | TWIN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 42.70% | 11.77% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -33.59% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 34.80% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -6.66% | 22.62% |
Frequently asked
- Which has grown faster, ACTG or TWIN?
- Over the past five years, ACTG grew revenue faster — ACTG at a 42.70% CAGR versus TWIN at 11.77%.
- Does ACTG or TWIN pay a bigger dividend?
- TWIN pays a dividend (0.59% yield), while ACTG is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is ACTG or TWIN more profitable?
- TWIN runs the higher net margin — ACTG at -5.39% versus TWIN at 7.10%.
- How have ACTG and TWIN total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, ACTG delivered -3.85% and TWIN delivered 9.18% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Twin Disc P/E ratioTwin Disc dividend yieldAcacia Research ROETwin Disc ROEAcacia Research operating marginTwin Disc operating marginAcacia Research revenue growthTwin Disc revenue growthAcacia Research free cash flowTwin Disc free cash flow
Acacia Research & Twin Disc appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.