Which has the lower trailing P/E, ACIW or KLIC?

ACIW has the lower trailing P/E: ACIW trades at 23.67 and KLIC at 45.50. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ACIW or KLIC?

Over the past five years, ACIW grew revenue faster — ACIW at a 7.13% CAGR versus KLIC at -4.72%.

Does ACIW or KLIC pay a bigger dividend?

KLIC pays a dividend (0.83% yield), while ACIW has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is ACIW or KLIC more profitable?

ACIW runs the higher net margin — ACIW at 12.40% versus KLIC at 12.18%.

How have ACIW and KLIC total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ACIW delivered 10.08% and KLIC delivered 23.94% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

ACI Worldwide, Inc. (ACIW) vs Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. (KLIC)

A side-by-side comparison of ACI Worldwide, Inc. and Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ACIW

ACI Worldwide, Inc.

$5.25B

$51.60TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 9:30 AM EDT

KLIC

Kulicke and Soffa Industries, Inc.

$5.17B

$98.73TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 5, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — ACIW vs KLIC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

ACIW +162.8% (+10.1%/yr)KLIC +766.4% (+24.1%/yr)KLIC compounded faster over this window

ACIW KLIC

ACIW vs KLIC: by the numbers

•ACIW is the larger company ($5.25B vs $5.17B market cap).
•ACIW trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (23.67 vs 45.50 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ACIW converts more revenue to profit (12.40% vs 12.18% net margin).
•ACIW grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.13% vs -4.72% CAGR).
•KLIC pays a dividend (0.83% yield), while ACIW has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ACIW	KLIC
P/E ratio	23.67	45.50
Forward P/E	19.92	16.72
PEG ratio	0.83	N/A
P/S ratio	2.88	5.44
P/B ratio	3.50	5.67
EV / EBITDA	13.35	33.75
FCF yield	6.76%	0.77%

Profitability

Metric	ACIW	KLIC
Gross margin	49.08%	48.18%
Operating margin	18.61%	-0.49%
Net margin	12.40%	12.18%
ROE	15.08%	12.69%
ROIC	10.34%	10.22%

Dividends

Metric	ACIW	KLIC
Dividend yield	N/A	0.83%
Payout ratio	N/A	37.79%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ACIW	KLIC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	7.13%	-4.72%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	28.60%	-65.58%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	5.52%	-26.60%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	10.79%	13.96%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ACIW or KLIC?: ACIW has the lower trailing P/E: ACIW trades at 23.67 and KLIC at 45.50. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ACIW or KLIC?: Over the past five years, ACIW grew revenue faster — ACIW at a 7.13% CAGR versus KLIC at -4.72%.
Does ACIW or KLIC pay a bigger dividend?: KLIC pays a dividend (0.83% yield), while ACIW has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is ACIW or KLIC more profitable?: ACIW runs the higher net margin — ACIW at 12.40% versus KLIC at 12.18%.
How have ACIW and KLIC total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ACIW delivered 10.08% and KLIC delivered 23.94% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ACIW analysis Full KLIC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

ACI Worldwide P/E ratio Kulicke and Soffa Industries P/E ratio Kulicke and Soffa Industries dividend yield ACI Worldwide ROE Kulicke and Soffa Industries ROE ACI Worldwide operating margin Kulicke and Soffa Industries operating margin ACI Worldwide revenue growth Kulicke and Soffa Industries revenue growth ACI Worldwide free cash flow Kulicke and Soffa Industries free cash flow

ACI Worldwide & Kulicke and Soffa Industries appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.