Achieve Life Sciences, Inc. (ACHV) vs Mesa Laboratories, Inc. (MLAB)

A side-by-side comparison of Achieve Life Sciences, Inc. and Mesa Laboratories, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — ACHV vs MLAB

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
ACHV -99.2% (-38.5%/yr)MLAB +26.7% (+2.4%/yr)MLAB compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
01101001kStart $10020182020202220242026$1$127
ACHV MLAB

ACHV vs MLAB: by the numbers

  • •MLAB is the larger company ($756M vs $722M market cap).
  • •MLAB is profitable (1.92% net margin) while ACHV runs a net loss (0.00%).
  • •MLAB pays a dividend (0.45% yield), while ACHV has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricACHVMLAB
P/E ratioN/A160.77
PEG ratioN/A11.83
P/S ratioN/A3.03
P/B ratioN/A4.00
EV / EBITDAN/A18.19
FCF yieldN/A7.00%

Profitability

MetricACHVMLAB
Gross margin0.00%65.99%
Operating margin0.00%9.00%
Net margin0.00%1.92%
ROEN/A2.54%
ROICN/A3.29%

Dividends

MetricACHVMLAB
Dividend yieldN/A0.45%
Payout ratioN/A76.19%

Growth (annualized)

MetricACHVMLAB
Revenue CAGR (5Y)N/A12.45%
EPS CAGR (5Y)N/A13.08%
FCF CAGR (5Y)N/A4.63%
Total return CAGR (5Y)-4.33%-13.52%

Frequently asked

Does ACHV or MLAB pay a bigger dividend?
MLAB pays a dividend (0.45% yield), while ACHV has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is ACHV or MLAB more profitable?
MLAB runs the higher net margin — ACHV at 0.00% versus MLAB at 1.92%.
How have ACHV and MLAB total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, ACHV delivered -39.18% and MLAB delivered 2.29% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.