Arcosa, Inc. (ACA) vs WD-40 Company (WDFC)
A side-by-side comparison of Arcosa, Inc. and WD-40 Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 21, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
ACA
Arcosa, Inc.
$144.90Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
WDFC
WD-40 Company
$217.08Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — ACA vs WDFC
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8yACA +624.9% (+28.1%/yr)WDFC +47.8% (+5.0%/yr)ACA compounded faster over this window
ACA WDFC
ACA vs WDFC: by the numbers
- •ACA is the larger company ($7.12B vs $2.91B market cap).
- •ACA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.57 vs 32.21 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •ACA converts more revenue to profit (17.90% vs 13.22% net margin).
- •ACA grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.59% vs 6.85% CAGR).
- •WDFC pays the higher dividend yield (1.89% vs 0.14%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ACA | WDFC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 14.57 | 32.21 |
| Forward P/E | 33.97 | 34.54 |
| P/S ratio | 2.61 | 4.23 |
| P/B ratio | 2.40 | 10.25 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.54 | 22.82 |
| FCF yield | 1.89% | 2.78% |
Profitability
| Metric | ACA | WDFC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 23.04% | 55.82% |
| Operating margin | 11.83% | 17.48% |
| Net margin | 17.90% | 13.22% |
| ROE | 16.47% | 32.01% |
| ROIC | 5.81% | 22.75% |
Dividends
| Metric | ACA | WDFC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | 1.89% |
| Payout ratio | 4.71% | 59.70% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ACA | WDFC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.59% | 6.85% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 14.08% | 8.73% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -0.26% | 9.34% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 23.86% | -0.29% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, ACA or WDFC?
- ACA has the lower trailing P/E: ACA trades at 14.57 and WDFC at 32.21. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, ACA or WDFC?
- Over the past five years, ACA grew revenue faster — ACA at a 7.59% CAGR versus WDFC at 6.85%.
- Does ACA or WDFC pay a bigger dividend?
- ACA yields 0.14% and WDFC yields 1.89% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ACA or WDFC more profitable?
- ACA runs the higher net margin — ACA at 17.90% versus WDFC at 13.22%.
- How have ACA and WDFC total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, ACA delivered 23.86% and WDFC delivered 7.87% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Arcosa P/E ratioWD-40 P/E ratioArcosa dividend yieldWD-40 dividend yieldArcosa ROEWD-40 ROEArcosa operating marginWD-40 operating marginArcosa revenue growthWD-40 revenue growthArcosa free cash flowWD-40 free cash flow
Arcosa & WD-40 appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 21, 2026.